Fixed it for youUngrin wrote:
Personally, I know what the game needs. It needs to be balanced as a whole, which is why me and my guild all play fester bomb sw's
Well, I actually don't play fester except in keep defense. I actually play heal debuff with KA tactic. Actually, come to think of it, only 1 person in our guild runs fester.Morf wrote:Fixed it for youUngrin wrote:
Personally, I know what the game needs. It needs to be balanced as a whole, which is why me and my guild all play fester bomb sw's
Also let me say as someone who hasnt played order for quite some time, mara's are a joke and do need some tweaking.
perfect response! And you're exactly correct on why there were complaints at the highest levels. yeah, as a WH on live, after they were buffed, I just avoided them in T4 unless i knew it was a baddie, you couldn't beat them. I'm all for buffing other classes or counter-classes but then TTK can get dicey.I remember the immunity to armor penetration combined with the high armor possible with RR80+ armor sets being one of the main issues. It made for a class that did great damage, had great utility and was very tanky. I have a Mara here and played one on live. They get crazy strong. I'm not asking for the class to get nerfed, I believe in buffs > nerfs. I think the other melee could use some lovin compared to Mara/Slayer.
no link, it was in WL discussion, big thread last week.theOdinS0n wrote:Backrow do you have a link for that confirmed buff?
Balancing WL to Mara is silly because they aren't mirrors. The WL mirror Squig Header pet mechanic and the SW mirrors the Mara stance mechanic. Mara get extra stuff to balance that they don't get a pet and SW get extra stuff that Squig Headers don't get to balance they don't get a pet.
Coming on the forums to derail an AAO thread with Marauder whine is sad. I don't see Order running to the forums to talk about the 2-3k festering arrows you hypocrite.
Just out of curiosity: how is Mara survivability and Slayer *something* in any way linked? Are the two classes spiritual twins that you can't effect one without needing to effect the other?Penril wrote:I believe he meant that you can`t have all of that in one spec. Which is correct.Ungrin wrote:That's your rebuttal? Are you not allowed to switch stances? Are you playing with 1 gimp arm and can't hit the button?Coryphaus wrote:all of that isnt on one stance though
Talk about trolling.
I agree though that Maras need some toning down (specifically, their survivability). But not unless you tone down Slayers too.
It's called "Realm balance".Greatwarden wrote:
Just out of curiosity: how is Mara survivability and Slayer *something* in any way linked? Are the two classes spiritual twins that you can't effect one without needing to effect the other?
Don't forget engineers you biased pig!Penril wrote:It's called "Realm balance".Greatwarden wrote:
Just out of curiosity: how is Mara survivability and Slayer *something* in any way linked? Are the two classes spiritual twins that you can't effect one without needing to effect the other?
Both are mDPS
Both are OP and better than the other mDPS in their realms
Another option would be to leave Mara/Slayers alone, and just buff Choppas/WLs (and maybe WHs/WEs?). But this would reduce TTK even more. It is simply easier to just ask for Mara/Slayer nerfs.
What we can all agree though is that Magus needs some serious nerfs.
Engi's can auto attack, Magus can't, devs favor Order, Orders OP!Ungrin wrote: Don't forget engineers you biased pig!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests
