Remove Vanquisher as requirement for Invader

[Spyked1106]

let the vanquisher some classes need it
but one thing is true, is too much expensive

[Strakar]

I agree with OP if you throw alts into the mix. One char is easy to invest all your time, hit forts and get full vanq to unlock inv medals from orvr. I started collecting inv from forts in my 20s. I win bags on defense, never attack (tank).

However, my rr 48 alt has zero inv medals because I threw them all at my main. Still need to for fort weapons. But no one is forcing you to play an alt. The SC grind for oppressor feels worse just for the weapons, let alone if you want any armor. City will be tough depending on your play time, but you can still be competitive in inv/opp/BL.

If we were going to change anything...

- Remove shards and just make medals drop on kills. Lower drop rate slightly if needed. I think I've gotten 19 royal and 14 inv from 25-68, wouldn't be game breaking. Shards seem like wasted currency.

- Make RNG for bag items work the same for orvr bags. You get a bonus to your roll for items you don't have yet, less chance to get repeats.

[Drednes]

i got a full set of Invader before i put on a single piece of vanquisher think you dont know what you are talking about
and earn your gear dont compare people who put in the time to you who wants **** quick and easy
its easier than ever with getting so many vanq medalions in bags you might get full vanq before full conq if you have a solid rr above your lvl

[Avelinna]

Totally agree on my main i was never full invader of vanq but a mix of both you dont need all vanquisher in most situations. Invader unlock should stay as it is endgame requirement and as endgame should not be made overly easy to obtain. This would be dumming down and easymode people need to work for endgame armour. Vanquisher is not endgame armor and should be not added into requirement for invader.