Maybe its time to also remove, reduce the effect or increase the costs of the renown abilities that gives avoidance.
Personally I don't like the cost increase option as it will give high ranked players to much edge over lower ones. But it sounds like something needs to be done about this.
RDPS SH vs Sorc
Ads
Re: RDPS SH vs Sorc
I am pretty sure that 808 hit, happened in a scenario with double flag damage boost mechanic...Otherwise is totally imposible to achieve that damage hit, without unshakable 2th moral.Stinkyweed wrote:I have not played much since the removal of M2 Unshakeable Focus, but below are my numbers since that patch:
Yer Bleedin!
Count: 8012
Normal: 62%
Average: 120
Max: 503 (vs. lvl40 SW)
Mitigation: 46%
Crit: 38%
Average: 262
Max: 808 (vs. lvl40 Slayer)
Mitigation: 43%
Even the first one 503 hit, looks like was inside one of those scenarios.
Looking at the numbers show in average:
We see 120 hit and 262 hit over weak targets.
Really show how bad the dot ticks in SH class are.
A mid armored class will be able of mitigate much more damage, and make those average hits 80-150...way to low for need stack 1050 BS and 650 WS.
Tanks are hitting harder with 450 strength in those targets, while they are still tanks.
And WL or WH are eons away of 120 - 262 average tickets hits in those weak targets...
They doing 1,8k in one hit, while SH is not going to reach that damage even with all DOT ticks together during 15 seconds, if nobody cleanse the DOT first.
Re: RDPS SH vs Sorc
Thank you. Nice and big sample size here showing a nice average and hopefully putting this 90 damage ticks bullshit to rest.Stinkyweed wrote:I have not played much since the removal of M2 Unshakeable Focus, but below are my numbers since that patch:
Yer Bleedin!
Count: 8012
Normal: 62%
Average: 120
Max: 503 (vs. lvl40 SW)
Mitigation: 46%
Crit: 38%
Average: 262
Max: 808 (vs. lvl40 Slayer)
Mitigation: 43%
Edit: Note that the info is from a whole 8k ticks across all classes. This showing an average of 262 means the skill is indeed doing decent damage, the fact that a lot of the ticks would have landed on tanks/guarded targets means that the overall potency of the skill will be considerably higher on the right targets.
Rip Phalanx
Re: RDPS SH vs Sorc
Chose the SH.
Much more fun, and way better as soloing and grp.
I'm enjoy hunting a sorc with my WL but SH is a little more tricky tbh.
Much more fun, and way better as soloing and grp.
I'm enjoy hunting a sorc with my WL but SH is a little more tricky tbh.
Re: RDPS SH vs Sorc
Haojin wrote:Sorc > SH for AoE
when that happened ?
25/11/2017
Re: RDPS SH vs Sorc
you have no idea what you talking about.Penril wrote:Haojin wrote:Sorc > SH for AoE
when that happened ?
25/11/2017
ignorance is bliss anyways.
Guildmaster of Phalanx
K8P - Karak Norn
K8P - Karak Norn
Re: RDPS SH vs Sorc
Magus >> SH/Sorc for aoe.
period.
period.
Bretin: "destru classes are in general better for solo play"
A lot of addons here | Just a few T3 vids from live game | Remove IP-blocking at forum!

A lot of addons here | Just a few T3 vids from live game | Remove IP-blocking at forum!