Kyran wrote:Hi everyone,
So I want to lvl up an "offtank dps" if you know what I mean. I levled both BG and BO to lvl 10 and both of their gameplay is cool for me (even if BO's one seems more "dynamic"). Same for the style, i love DE and I love the clunky aspect of the BO.
The thing is I did some research on the forum and it looks like everyone is saying that BO does more damage, he also has the advantage to carry a shield (block chance, hold the lane,...), and he has more utility for a group than the 2H BG (ok he has that 10% crit buff aoe but that's all, isn't it...?).
So is there a point to play a BG rather than a BO for a "tanky dps" in every aspect of the game (PVE/RVR/6man/SC)? Or is the BO better in every way?
PS : English is not my native language, so sorry for the mistakes.
To answer the OP.
This is the only question you need to answer:
Q: Are you OK with using a shield? If yes -> BO.
If no -> BG.
As an "off tank" I think a SnB BO > SnB BG. However a 2H BG > 2H BO.
2H BOs DO have more damage output, but they are noticably squishier where the BG has tactics and abilities that help make them tankier with modest damage output. (Think Damage IN vs Damage Out here) and that is where I think BG wins - 2H.
Sounds like you are Ok using a SnB set up AND sounds like you LIKE the BO mechanic itself (which is a turn off for me personally).
So I would strongly encourage you to roll SnB BO. You will have modest damage output, you will have nice group benefits, and be able to tank/off tank - even if you build more "DPS-Y" as as a SnB that is just fine, you will provide moderate damage, and still be tanky. Just PLEASE do not turn into one of those Offtard (opposite of Deftard) "DPS Tanks" who go full strength stacking and forgo all parry/block/dodge/disrupt to "DEEPS BRO!" These people are waste of space and should just roll a Mara or something else instead...
TLDR: I think a BO is more your style of play - based on what you wrote.