Improving the 2H blackguard playstyle

Share your ideas and feedback to help improve the game.
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.

This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.

To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Scrilian
Posts: 1570

Re: 2H BG needs access to a knockdown

Post#391 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:50 pm

noisestorm wrote:Why should he? If youre not reading and following the progression of the topic its obviously your fault - not his.
So can't even post my opinion on the topic before I read 40+ pages of dessie biased word womit? :o
Вальтер Рыжий RU => Gaziraga BW, Valefar WL, Lovejoy
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos ;)

Ads
User avatar
noisestorm
Posts: 1727

Re: 2H BG needs access to a knockdown

Post#392 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:54 pm

Not if you honestly think someone will care about you and your opinion in return. Especially not if youre not up to date of the actual talk inside the topic at all.

Reklaw
Posts: 167

Re: 2H BG needs access to a knockdown

Post#393 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:56 pm

Everyone should just cope with his class's weaknesses and strengths. And if you can't or don't want to do that reroll. And if you dont want to do that, you might want to find something else to play.
The differences between mirror-classes are there intentionally to at least vary it a little bit. It's a good thing that class A doesnt have a knockback (example) and his mirror does, i'm sure they have something else that the mirror doesn't. In my opinion ofcourse.
CRITICAL ACCLAIM
Reklaw R40 SO - Jabberwocky R40 DoK - Googol R40 MAg - Tinteling R40 MAr - Jabster R41 Chp - Unoffensive R23 SH - Jabbywoo R33 Zealot - Kittycat - Donalduck

Ihavecats R40 WL - Jabber R32 - Species R42 BW - Panini R26 AM - Frailty

User avatar
Scrilian
Posts: 1570

Re: 2H BG needs access to a knockdown

Post#394 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:58 pm

noisestorm wrote:Not if you honestly think someone will care about you and your opinion in return. Especially not if youre not up to date of the actual talk inside the topic at all.
It matters to me and tbh it's all that matters. Besides, you could've surely derailed to some off topic sifvermf stuff so updating to topic name would help a lot, not to confuse people with their own opinions on it.
Вальтер Рыжий RU => Gaziraga BW, Valefar WL, Lovejoy
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos ;)

ThePollie
Banned
Posts: 411

Re: 2H BG needs access to a knockdown

Post#395 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:00 pm

If the thread has shifted to discussing Crimson Death, then perhaps another thread is in order.

As it is, it's 40 pages with a title for a Blackguard knockdown.

Make a new thread, open it with a post of what you've learned thus far, discuss from there.

User avatar
noisestorm
Posts: 1727

Re: 2H BG needs access to a knockdown

Post#396 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:06 pm

ThePollie wrote:If the thread has shifted to discussing Crimson Death, then perhaps another thread is in order.

As it is, it's 40 pages with a title for a Blackguard knockdown.

Make a new thread, open it with a post of what you've learned thus far, discuss from there.
Exactly this sounds more as it should look like. But buffing CD to 10 seconds back like it was some time ago was already being considered by Aza iirc, so for this purpose we dont really need a new topic atm.

Id rather have some talk about Blade of Ruin other than making it a KD : p

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: 2H BG needs access to a knockdown

Post#397 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:10 pm

I just want to thank the moderators. They are doing a pretty good job in this forum (seriously! no trolling i swear!).

User avatar
TenTonHammer
Posts: 3806

Re: 2H BG needs access to a knockdown

Post#398 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:13 pm

noisestorm wrote: Id rather have some talk about Blade of Ruin other than making it a KD : p

yes but im not sure what BoR should be; if we change the functionality to be a debuff or buff type ability then

BG already has tough, wounds, armor, int, wp, block/parry, crit chance debuffs

and self tough str and wp buffs so i dont know what we need to change it to

if its going to remain a dot then the needs to be significantly strengthened in order to take it over ET or CF
Image

Ads
User avatar
Scrilian
Posts: 1570

Re: Improving the 2H blackguard playstyle

Post#399 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:19 pm

Sad day for "Improving the 2H swordmaster playstyle" thread, but of well :C
Вальтер Рыжий RU => Gaziraga BW, Valefar WL, Lovejoy
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos ;)

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: Improving the 2H blackguard playstyle

Post#400 » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:22 pm

Scrilian wrote:Sad day for "Improving the 2H swordmaster playstyle" thread, but of well :C
Try this thread, maybe you can continue what others suggested in november.

http://www.returnofreckoning.com/forum/ ... &start=100

edit: of course, it is advisable that you read the whole thing before you give any suggestions.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gangan, gromgor, ReikiDagi, Sinisterror and 8 guests