Warhammer Online
https://returnofreckoning.com/forum/
Because that can be gamed and the proposal is only a temporary restriction on renown, XP, crests and bags until their 'timer' runs out. It allows them to play the game which, quite frankly, is what we are all here for!Aethilmar wrote: Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:08 am Why would you not want to reward a group/WB for making things "more even"?
Also - if tier is tier1, dont apply debuff.Delerium69 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:59 am
- If the AAO of the side they enter the lake on is > 0% then do not apply debuff
I'm relatively new to the server, and haven't followed the devs stances on different topics across the ages but, from this reply (viewtopic.php?t=44442&start=20#p581941), it seems that up to august 2025 having multiple accounts was more or less tolerated. Even circumventing the lockout was not really punished or prosecuted ("If someone really wants to get around our very minor lockout timer and implementation, they can, but they'll know we would rather they didn't and have to live with that mild guilt of disapproval for several minutes").Delerium69 wrote: Fri Jan 16, 2026 9:06 amBecause that can be gamed and the proposal is only a temporary restriction on renown, XP, crests and bags until their 'timer' runs out. It allows them to play the game which, quite frankly, is what we are all here for!Aethilmar wrote: Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:08 am Why would you not want to reward a group/WB for making things "more even"?
as far as i know people used a vpn to circumvent it but i dont beleive that method works anymore.krumhur wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 2:31 pmI'm relatively new to the server, and haven't followed the devs stances on different topics across the ages but, from this reply (viewtopic.php?t=44442&start=20#p581941), it seems that up to august 2025 having multiple accounts was more or less tolerated. Even circumventing the lockout was not really punished or prosecuted ("If someone really wants to get around our very minor lockout timer and implementation, they can, but they'll know we would rather they didn't and have to live with that mild guilt of disapproval for several minutes").Delerium69 wrote: Fri Jan 16, 2026 9:06 amBecause that can be gamed and the proposal is only a temporary restriction on renown, XP, crests and bags until their 'timer' runs out. It allows them to play the game which, quite frankly, is what we are all here for!Aethilmar wrote: Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:08 am Why would you not want to reward a group/WB for making things "more even"?
Has the devs stance changed with the new lockout system? It would be appropriate to have a clear reply to this I guess.