Blatant hatred towards disabled players.

[ufthakk]

"We know Sequencer could use more work and we are working with the community to make it great." Something. Anything. Aside from tough titties find a new game.

For some reason they are not able to act like that. Leave u with the feeling that u just an expendable guest which opinion could be ignored.

[wargrimnir]

The OP got his answer - now it derails again like the 20 NB threads before

Your answer to me and most disabled people: "Tough. Deal with it."

Instead of actually being leaders we can look up to in this field you're acting like bullies towards the NB addon and its player base. You could instead be saying: "We are looking into making Sequencer better which is an alternative to NB without making it OP with so many conditionals. We know Sequencer could use more work and we are working with the community to make it great." Something. Anything. Aside from tough titties find a new game.

We would say that if anything like that were being done. It's clearly not happening, and there's no desire to make Sequence great, limited functionality was the intended goal. If getting clear and direct information from staff comes off as bullying, that's not the intent at all. We understand the impact you're portraying here and it's been deemed an acceptable loss to remove NB. We very much disagree with the intent you're trying to frame us under. If you're unable to come to terms with this change, then you should leave. There's nothing else here for you.

[ufthakk]

The OP got his answer - now it derails again like the 20 NB threads before

Your answer to me and most disabled people: "Tough. Deal with it."

Instead of actually being leaders we can look up to in this field you're acting like bullies towards the NB addon and its player base. You could instead be saying: "We are looking into making Sequencer better which is an alternative to NB without making it OP with so many conditionals. We know Sequencer could use more work and we are working with the community to make it great." Something. Anything. Aside from tough titties find a new game.

We would say that if anything like that were being done. It's clearly not happening, and there's no desire to make Sequence great, limited functionality was the intended goal. If getting clear and direct information from staff comes off as bullying, that's not the intent at all. We understand the impact you're portraying here and it's been deemed an acceptable loss to remove NB. We very much disagree with the intent you're trying to frame us under. If you're unable to come to terms with this change, then you should leave. There's nothing else here for you.

Sequencer works as intended like msh ?

[eldriyth]

The OP got his answer - now it derails again like the 20 NB threads before

Your answer to me and most disabled people: "Tough. Deal with it."

Instead of actually being leaders we can look up to in this field you're acting like bullies towards the NB addon and its player base. You could instead be saying: "We are looking into making Sequencer better which is an alternative to NB without making it OP with so many conditionals. We know Sequencer could use more work and we are working with the community to make it great." Something. Anything. Aside from tough titties find a new game.

We would say that if anything like that were being done. It's clearly not happening, and there's no desire to make Sequence great, limited functionality was the intended goal. If getting clear and direct information from staff comes off as bullying, that's not the intent at all. We understand the impact you're portraying here and it's been deemed an acceptable loss to remove NB. We very much disagree with the intent you're trying to frame us under. If you're unable to come to terms with this change, then you should leave. There's nothing else here for you.

Wow...

Sequencer doesn't even have world of warcraft's macro system in power and the team thinks this is acceptable? You also just told a war veteran to leave and find a new game because your team won't budge to make sequencer better, yet you direct players with disabilities to this gimped addon and don't support it?

[wargrimnir]

Your answer to me and most disabled people: "Tough. Deal with it."

Instead of actually being leaders we can look up to in this field you're acting like bullies towards the NB addon and its player base. You could instead be saying: "We are looking into making Sequencer better which is an alternative to NB without making it OP with so many conditionals. We know Sequencer could use more work and we are working with the community to make it great." Something. Anything. Aside from tough titties find a new game.

We would say that if anything like that were being done. It's clearly not happening, and there's no desire to make Sequence great, limited functionality was the intended goal. If getting clear and direct information from staff comes off as bullying, that's not the intent at all. We understand the impact you're portraying here and it's been deemed an acceptable loss to remove NB. We very much disagree with the intent you're trying to frame us under. If you're unable to come to terms with this change, then you should leave. There's nothing else here for you.

Wow...

Sequencer doesn't even have world of warcraft's macro system in power and the team thinks this is acceptable? You also just told a war veteran to leave and find a new game because your team won't budge to make sequencer better, yet you direct players with disabilities to this gimped addon and don't support it?

If I could provide you an even more clear answer, I would. Your veteran status isn't a factor in any decisions the team makes, nor are any disabilities suffered by players of the game. NB provided a level of macro ability that was deemed inappropriate years past, blocking it was always on the cards, and the replacement was never going to be anywhere near its functionality. If that's not enough for you, then I hope you find another game that provides for your needs. We have no plans of reimplementing the features of NB that were blocked. Sequencer has not been worked on in months, and no one should have any expectation that it's worked on in the future.

[uanaka]

From my understanding - sequencer was never supposed to be an equal alternative to NB. The reason NB was disabled was because of how much it could be customized. On the other hand, sequencer is purely meant to be a sequencer addon, without extra functions of positionals, conditionals, etc.

[GamesBond]

The OP got his answer - now it derails again like the 20 NB threads before

Your answer to me and most disabled people: "Tough. Deal with it."

Instead of actually being leaders we can look up to in this field you're acting like bullies towards the NB addon and its player base. You could instead be saying: "We are looking into making Sequencer better which is an alternative to NB without making it OP with so many conditionals. We know Sequencer could use more work and we are working with the community to make it great." Something. Anything. Aside from tough titties find a new game.

No. His answer means that we've had enough of the NB ban discussion before, we clarified our stance several times and then voiced our opinion and actions in the Q&A. If you missed all of these, that's your problem. You can freely search previous threads discussing the ban and you can watch the Q&A on Youtube.

Now that you've got several answers from the team and from the community members, pick the one you like and move forward. Rephrasing everything we say to suit your agenda won't take you anywhere.