Allright, last try.bloodi wrote:tomato wrote:Learn2read.tomato wrote:6vs6 balance includes every group synergy/setup possible. (and therefor almost every warband synergy)I think i got it pretty well.tomato wrote:The point is, if you want to account all "wb synergies", as small they may be it will be so much more complicated (actually impossible to do it right) than just doing it for 6mans.
I think that your problem is i see rather well the intent of your posts. I just dont really get your obsession with being catered to at all costs, if they dont design the game for you and just for you, somehow is a problem.tomato wrote:But I'm not expecting you to actually understand what I post. You proved already you're not capable of understanding.
I prefer balancing around 6mans. As in my opinion they are affected by every significant synergy.
You believe in balance around 24 man, because in your opinion the from my point of view insignificant warband synergies are important.
So my math should show, that even if the warband synergies are important (which I don't think) it would be far to complex to account for them.