Recent Topics

Ads

DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Share your ideas and feedback to help improve the game.
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.

This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.

To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
DefinitelyNotWingz
Posts: 286

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#231 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:00 pm

Penril wrote:
DefinitelyNotWingz wrote:
Penril wrote:Is Kiss of Death uncleansable by WP?
Should be an ailment, have never seen it being cleansed by wp.
If it is uncleansable by WP i guess it might be balanced then. WE has an easier time getting to the WP than an IB anyway. At least in the initial clash where the WE can stealth and jump the WP, while on the other hand you can see the IB coming at you from a mile away. Also, Inspiring attack has a 5 sec CD, while Kiss of Death is a proc.

I don´t know, just pointing that out. If you guys think Kiss of Death is an acceptable outgoing HD counter for WPs and balanced with IB/Doks, then neither side would benefit more than the other one with a range decrease on WP/Dok heals.

Still, not sure if reducing their heal range is a good solution (don't remember if i agreed with it on earlier pages, won't bother checking, if so then i guess i changed my mind now).

Silly idea that could be completely silly but think about it and just let me know how silly (or not) it is: what if cloth healers could cast group heals while moving, but the cast times were increased? Gather round (shaman) takes 2.5 secs while stationary. What if it could be cast while moving but it instead took 3.5 secs or something like that?

WE cant switch targets to just debuff. Not even to mention, wasting a finisher or that the debuff lasts 5s.
While snb IB is not even contributing dmg and can switch targets as he wishes.

Your idea with the grp heal would actually prohibit st healers in large scale pvp.
You know who I am.

Ads
User avatar
Shadowgurke
Posts: 618

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#232 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:04 pm

So by making DoK/DoK weak to IB, doesn't that mean that maybe DoK/Zel is better? Isn't that a good think? Now what if we do the same for WP/WP? (Read: Change debuff type of BG)
Image

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#233 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:05 pm

DefinitelyNotWingz wrote:

WE cant switch targets to just debuff. Not even to mention, wasting a finisher or that the debuff lasts 5s.
While snb IB is not even contributing dmg and can switch targets as he wishes.

Your idea with the grp heal would actually prohibit st healers in large scale pvp.

Kisses don't proc on finishers. They can proc on all WE attacks, unlike WHs. So even if cleansed it can be reapplied pretty fast (no CD).

As for my suggestion, i warned you all it could be silly. It's just that the more i think about it, the more i agree that cloth healers should be looked at (instead of nerfing WP/Dok). Even though i feel cloth healers are ok, fact remains that Dok/WP will always be better when fighting against largest numbers. And i could be wrong on this, but i wish all 6 healers could be as viable when zerg busting.

User avatar
noisestorm
Posts: 1727

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#234 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:08 pm

Shadowgurke wrote:So by making DoK/DoK weak to IB, doesn't that mean that maybe DoK/Zel is better? Isn't that a good think? Now what if we do the same for WP/WP? (Read: Change debuff type of BG)
Rather equalize the "what can be cleansed by which class" along the board.

I just find it strange that WP can cleanse outgoings, but no incs, while its inverse for the DoK.

User avatar
DefinitelyNotWingz
Posts: 286

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#235 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:10 pm

Shadowgurke wrote:So by making DoK/DoK weak to IB, doesn't that mean that maybe DoK/Zel is better? Isn't that a good think? Now what if we do the same for WP/WP? (Read: Change debuff type of BG)
BG can have a 30s outgoing healdebuff with 0 cd, we better not change just the type. :P

Dok/zel takes the ib a few more seconds to cover his debuffs, with earthshatter we already have the first one before even reaching the target. On the other side 65f nerfs wp/rp when the bg is healdebuffing. Not sure if it is a win.

As it is now, if we only change the range, it will be order biased.
You know who I am.

User avatar
DefinitelyNotWingz
Posts: 286

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#236 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:13 pm

Penril wrote:
DefinitelyNotWingz wrote:

WE cant switch targets to just debuff. Not even to mention, wasting a finisher or that the debuff lasts 5s.
While snb IB is not even contributing dmg and can switch targets as he wishes.

Your idea with the grp heal would actually prohibit st healers in large scale pvp.

Kisses don't proc on finishers. They can proc on all WE attacks, unlike WHs. So even if cleansed it can be reapplied pretty fast (no CD).

As for my suggestion, i warned you all it could be silly. It's just that the more i think about it, the more i agree that cloth healers should be looked at (instead of nerfing WP/Dok). Even though i feel cloth healers are ok, fact remains that Dok/WP will always be better when fighting against largest numbers. And i could be wrong on this, but i wish all 6 healers could be as viable when zerg busting.
Woops, my bad. :P
Ever seen a good rp in RoR? We play 3 dps lately and against good rps it is impossible to kill sth guarded.
RP is absolutely fine. Shaman too. We will see how shatter confidence will affect him.
You know who I am.

User avatar
Morf
Posts: 1247

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#237 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:19 pm

Without reading all 24 pages...for me changing all dok/wp heal range to 65 ft would be the fix, they are suppose to be frontline healers which is why they have such good armor values, such good def tactics and so low cast times.
May not work but i think its worth thinking about before deciding to make radical changes to dok/wp.
Morfee - Shaman / Mynnos - Kotbs / Grubod - Black Orc / Snubz - Squig Herder

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#238 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:21 pm

Morf wrote:Without reading all 24 pages...for me changing all dok/wp heal range to 65 ft would be the fix, they are suppose to be frontline healers which is why they have such good armor values, such good def tactics and so low cast times.
May not work but i think its worth thinking about before deciding to make radical changes to dok/wp.
Not sure about all. I would start only with their Group Heal and work from there, adjusting as needed. If it is a disaster, we roll back.

Time to test things after all, right? Alpha and all that...

Ads
ThePollie
Banned
Posts: 411

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#239 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:23 pm

Penril wrote:
Morf wrote:Without reading all 24 pages...for me changing all dok/wp heal range to 65 ft would be the fix, they are suppose to be frontline healers which is why they have such good armor values, such good def tactics and so low cast times.
May not work but i think its worth thinking about before deciding to make radical changes to dok/wp.
Not sure about all. I would start only with their Group Heal and work from there, adjusting as needed. If it is a disaster, we roll back.

Time to test things after all, right? Alpha and all that...
While not approving or disapproving of nerfing casted heals, I definitely oppose nerfing the range of melee healing. It's already gimped enough.

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: DoK/WP with book/chalice...

Post#240 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:25 pm

ThePollie wrote:
Penril wrote:
Morf wrote:Without reading all 24 pages...for me changing all dok/wp heal range to 65 ft would be the fix, they are suppose to be frontline healers which is why they have such good armor values, such good def tactics and so low cast times.
May not work but i think its worth thinking about before deciding to make radical changes to dok/wp.
Not sure about all. I would start only with their Group Heal and work from there, adjusting as needed. If it is a disaster, we roll back.

Time to test things after all, right? Alpha and all that...
While not approving or disapproving of nerfing casted heals, I definitely oppose nerfing the range of melee healing. It's already gimped enough.
I don't think anyone has suggested nerfing their melee heals. Pretty sure Morf wasn't including melee heals in his "all dok/wp heal" comment.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests