Page 3 of 6

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 2:55 pm
by KikkL
nodsavage wrote:it's more important to fix a bug on mounts, rather than correcting the true bug of the game .
example buff or Debuf that work side order and not destruction or the reverse.
bugger of skills
but it's more important to fix mounts !

Theyre gonna give the mounts, mounts.

Now you see why this is so important! :D

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:21 pm
by Skorn
Azuzu wrote:Who cares? lol Why would you get so fired up as to make an angry post about it.

My little crew had a "group mount", the white wolves, but having to use my race specific mount again isn't going to change the game for me.


It's such an unimportant issue to be upset over. Bug fixed....move on


Edit after reading your replies:

You can have all the opinion you want. I'm all for expressing ideas and concerns. Your not doing that tho when your calling people bringing you a free product the, "fun police".

Your playing the victim in your following posts, your acting like you had an innocent complant and that the douchie people are jump all over you for it.

The truth is, in your original post, your critizing the people helping bring you a free product, calling them fun police for fixing a bug. The ironic part being is the only reason you can log onto the game at all and have "fun" is thanks to their efforts. If you want people to take you seriously, don't call them names, over a silly meaningless fix.

Your also insinuating their going out of their way to not fix important issues and instead fixing meaningless ones. Implying that the fix of meaningless issues is taking up resources and a lot of time. Even tho you have no idea about the amount of work or difficulty involved in fixing....well any of the issues.
So okay, I can't use this expression because it is "calling people names". Ok then.

I'm not playing the victim in any way, if not in the way you understand what I've said. The day I'll act as a victim from something hasn't come yet. And the people who don't agree with me can. If I can't answer to the people who themselves answer to my post then I don't know what you want me to do. That doesn't mean they are douch or I don't know what else. Where did I call them wathever ?

Am I critisizing what they did ? Yes I did that. A critic is not an attack, it's a critic, if I wanted to attack them I would have done so much more than just pop a topic about a subject. Was I angry ? No, wathever people understood.

Yes I said that there was more important fix than this one, because it is my opinion. Azarael then stated why the devs tought it was something to fix. It was easier to fix that anyway than many others bugs and scrypt/code issue to that I agree. I answered to his post about what I tought about it, but did I said he was wrong in what they tought was right ? No, neither.

And last, if you think I don't know how much time and efforts it take to actually solve a programming issue then you're wrong. I do, and never did I say that they were wasting time and ressources on meaningless bugs if not for a priority of fixing wich has been answered early on in this topic already. It's like you know exactly what I do for a living, gratz.

Yes it is a trivial matter, yes the case is closed, we all agreed to that already, but still the answers keep coming on this topic and in game just because I dared say anything that was going "against" (and this is a matter that is subject to many debates) something that is wildely accepted. Did I victimized myself here ? No ...

So if it is so meaningless then why continue when I said just before the last post of azzarael that this topic I shall not follow again. Yes I still answered to what came that's a fact, notably because of some people in game (and one on this topic), "menacing" me to take care of me in game.

Now I suggest that this threads be locked since some people don't seem to mesure emotions in what they read. There is no anger or wathever some want to find in my posts.

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:32 pm
by Azuzu
The reason I suggested you were, "playing the victim" was because of this quote.
"Anyway, as I see that we don't have the right to speak of any changes and fix that's being made on the game beside some regular posters then I'll just stop wasting my time. See ya."
To me, when someone says, I don't have a right to speak, because people are disagreeing with them, it's playing the victim.

Instead of having self-reflection and questioning why your were getting such a negative backlash, you simply said your not allowed to express yourself. Maybe it's the way you expressed yourself to begin with that caused people to disagree so vehemently with you.


The reason, I believed you were suggesting they were wasting resources and time to fix a meaning less bug is because of this quote:
"You guys "fixed" the mounts bug (above all the other matters that need to be resolved) ?"
I read that to mean, they are "fixing" meaningless bugs instead of working on important ones. Ie: wasting time resources. My point was, without a knowledge of the work that it takes to fix an issue, it's silly to critize someone for fixing it.


You seem like a reasonable person, I apologize if my replies have come off as curt or overly aggressive. I agree with you, I'm sad to see my White Wolf mount go. I just take issue with the way you expressed your displeasure toward those bringing us a free product that they work hard on.

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:37 pm
by Ley
I hope Aza got enough **** from players as you are and is really considering to NOT FIX anything for a while, see how that works for you, see how fun is gonna be then to play WAR.
Learn to really appreciate that because of him and the team your sad behind is even able to play this game again.

/disgust

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:43 pm
by Libra
Learn to appreciate the Devs work and your happiness will contribute to the entire community.

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:51 pm
by Tiggo
jesus, you rather have the whole project in the risk then have a little less "fun" ?

"and I'm not going to risk the wrath of a company which is known to care a lot about how its IP is portrayed over a trivial thing like mounts."

this 1000% Games Workshop is known to be totally paranoic about its lore! I was very surprised it took aza some time to fix it, because i was sure he know how important that is for the whole project.

good job aza!

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:11 pm
by OldPlayer
Considering the word Lore was used (even Aza took the bait), I'd like to inquire where in Warhammer lore did Dwarfs use personal gyrocopters that look like strange contraptions we have in WAR/RoR?

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:11 pm
by Azarael
Whatever was included in Age of Reckoning was included with the blessing of GW.

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:31 pm
by bloodi
Azarael wrote:Whatever was included in Age of Reckoning was included with the blessing of GW.
But Age of the Sigmarines also had the blessing of GW.

Or was it the curse?

Re: "Mounts fix"

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:34 pm
by magter3001
Might as well just lock the thread and post the bug fixes of the new patch. I wouldn't call this a discussion anymore but instead people just trying to justify each other's pov. ;)