Re: Melees overperforming
Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 4:39 am
Give me? Wtf are you talking about?
The War Private Server
https://returnofreckoning.com/forum/
Give me? Wtf are you talking about?
There is literally only two WLs on the monthly kill board leaders and they are both the main dps from their respective organized guild WBs.lumpi33 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:17 am I thought you would address the melee blobbing a bit with the ability overhaul.
We are back to status quo:
https://ibb.co/kKf5RG9
https://ibb.co/5Lx9VS2
Melees in general an especially WLs and Choppas are overperforming by a large extend right now. Some classes that were bad before are still in a pretty terrible state and received even some harsh nerf. Like engis and skirmish or assault SWs. mSHs have at least a great aoe melee spec. Sorcs and BWs doing fine with close range specs.
It's still the melee aoe stacking and now also the proc meta that is completely out of balance. Please have a look at that.
The answer for Wl nad Choppa advantage is obvious; lets take something from a marauder )lumpi33 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 10:17 am I thought you would address the melee blobbing a bit with the ability overhaul.
We are back to status quo:
https://ibb.co/kKf5RG9
https://ibb.co/5Lx9VS2
Melees in general an especially WLs and Choppas are overperforming by a large extend right now. Some classes that were bad before are still in a pretty terrible state and received even some harsh nerf. Like engis and skirmish or assault SWs. mSHs have at least a great aoe melee spec. Sorcs and BWs doing fine with close range specs.
It's still the melee aoe stacking and now also the proc meta that is completely out of balance. Please have a look at that.
It's nerfs to playstyles and pigeon-holing. Nerfs to SM does make their 2h WB viability less, IB change affects SC and small scale. It's now there's less ways to play or even enjoy your class. Maybe the changes were warranted, but the result and reception has been less than favourable. At the end of the day, there's balance, and there's balance.Stimpz wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 5:00 pmKey word is tanks......SM and IB were nerfedSpoiler:
As I understood, only their 2H builds got nerfed: IB with DMG and Swordmaster with 2H defense.
Do they also perform worse in their RvR warband performance?
I must confess, I don't know if 2H SM is viable for warband play. Did they nerf them so hard that they can't no longer fulfill their role in the grand scheme of RvR?
I mean, 2H Chosen got nerfed hard too a few years ago; it sounded like a death sentence back then, but they only suffered in smallscale.
They are still fine Tanks. Even their 2H build is very viable in small scale, but they don't have opression and undefendable spirit DMG cleave anymore.
What I want to say is, is it really that dramatic over all? A bit less DMG, a bit less defense. I have the feeling they are still doing well.
Crazy that's the thought process - smaller aoe range gives better control over who you clip. 30ft 8 cap spreads out to any viable target within the 30ft, zero control over where to apply it.Nameless wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 6:21 pm Melee aoe were 30fts cos were designed for 8 players cap where most of the time you hit tanks and some guarded dps. Here however you got 24 cap and rather big aoe pressure area from classes that got numerous gap closers, aoe detaunts and somehow aoe spells better than their single target skills. 24 v 8 cap is huge macro change that differ the game significantly
SM got a big nerf. This patch was a big failure. Tank players dont wanna play anymore it seems. The whole day less tanks.....Stimpz wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 2:02 pmOder Tanks nerfed? Kotbs got a huge buff, with even more utility for the whole group. Chosen got a 5% parry nerf and a tiny bit more dmg for Relentless. Nothing else. Cherry-picking, my friend.CountTalabecland wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 1:40 pm There was clearly no logical attempt in the patch to solve the problems that the game actually has.
Destro and Choppa were made stronger, Order tanks nerfed, no help for Order RDPS being wasted slots.
And its the IB that gets its dmg and sustain nerf? Seriously this patch was madness.
It makes no sense. I quit until its fixed.
Slayer still does a ton of DMG, and WL is now in a better spot because it seems a lot jumped off the slayer train (without real reason), but yes, it is different now. When you play as a destro tank, you feel like a tank again and don't melt in the rampage wave. It is an odd feeling to suddenly have block and parry now.
Awesome read, which I agree on in every aspect. Didn't expect such a nice depiction of key factors in RvR. Analyzed in a neutral way and well presented.GONDOR wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 3:31 pmThat's not a case for rDPS WBs. If it was, we'd already see it.Rotgut wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2024 3:09 pm Yeah, they are. We'll have to wait till Devs reach the "Balance DPS" phase of their roadmap.
To make a case for rDPS in WBs tho. They don't need Guard. You can make a 1 tank, 2 healers, 1 BW/Sorc (for the proc and they can even play midrange if u want) and 2 rDPS party and it will work. That duo > 1 mDPS. Imo that is a good balance decision. mDPS should do more dmg than rDPS, but you can sacrifice a bit of CC and Tankiness to bring an extra DPS to increase your WB's dmg.
Balancing should be made around kiting, CCc, immunities - all that little dance - and not just DPS numbers, imo. Don't know how it could be done, its probably a pipe dream that they'll be able to make rDPS fully functional outside of blobwarfare and chokes, because i think the biggest challenge to that are Greenskin classes. They have self speed buff, immunities on command, pulls, pounce and 360º movable AoE. Gonna have to do a lot of spell changing while trying to not make rDPS absurdly OP at the same time.
MDPS is overperforming because RDPS can't come to the table/be at the bar in group play. A large chunk of it goes beyond numbers - it's down to macro and micro mechanics.
Melee AOEs are 30ft
Ridiculously generous - completely erodes the skill for melee to be in melee range. Most games would put 30ft into the short range category, instead of melee. It's wild that people think 30ft range is melee. It covers a huge area, and it's exceptionally easy to land on lots of targets. It's also much more forgiving being so huge to maximise damage, and favours blobs as they're able to stack hard and stack lazily to overlap their damage zones easily.
There is no skill and no real need to play tight as part of a melee train when it's this generous.
Ranged AOEs are static in more ways than one
Ranged AOEs are usually (not always) accompanied by a cast time or channel, or are placed on the ground and can't subsequently be moved. You compare this to melee AOEs, they emanate from the player, and move with the player. Situation has changed? No problem, just move the players and you can adapt. Ranged AOE requires better forethought and coordination to maximise its impact - this is the case in any rvr game. Ranged bomb takes planning, kiting, chokes, and synchronisation to pull off - melee is much more brutish and easy.
Melee is much easier to drive around with
Most warbands don't have the coordination (guilded or pug) to pull off an effective ranged bomb - nevermind the fact that ranged bomb doesn't exist. This isn't a slight to the guilds; it just requires tighter callouts and group play than anything I've heard in the last month, and actually requires comms to work effectively.
Melee synergises well with all buffs, auras, and damage overlapping from a clustered mobile centre
If you stack up on a central train location (warband leader) all buffs and offensive debuffs cleave out from that central location. This means you'll always get maximum effectiveness, as long as people stick with the marker. The nature of ranged mechanics means they'll often be spaghettied or at distance - buffs/debuffs might not properly land or take a higher level of capability to apply effectively.
Many Ranged AOEs don't stack (mostly GTAOE - equivalent to melee 360 PBAOE)
IDK why this is - definitely something that's come up a few times recently in the Discord. It's hard to bring anything to the table in a Warband in terms of effectiveness when you're at best a token class since it's better to stack up AOE damage that can stack, instead of AOE damage that can't. A large part of the kill skew will be down to this - for every 1 sorc, you might have 2-3 more choppas (BW:Lions, pick your poison). It's more effective for the warband and that's reflected in the numbers.
Bulk
Bulk is an important and often unknown factor in RvR combat - the mere presence of players in a location can change the pace or direction of a battle. What I mean by this is have you seen how X faction runs away when there's a whole bunch of players running at them? Melee has both the battlefield presence, and the bulk (resistances, EHP, etc.) to push the fight around - ranged doesn't. This is a huge factor in battlefield and fight flow and control.