Re: Lets talk Rampage
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:11 pm
this is how it works. this is how BG was nerfedGodlessCrom wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:24 pm "This class has something cool, cant we make it crappy?"
Nth thread iteration.
this is how it works. this is how BG was nerfedGodlessCrom wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:24 pm "This class has something cool, cant we make it crappy?"
Nth thread iteration.
I think you misunderstand the point of balance forums.Jinxypie wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:04 pm Why not? In balance forum isnt much room for discussion anyway. You can more or less only agree or disagree with proposal x y and thats about it.
Yeah, you need 15s to ramp back up to red if you pop Rampage in yellow, so its a burst window of 5s that is in line with BWs/Sorcs (5s back to yellow, if you pop it in red ~ so again, 5s of semi-effective 'burst'/the below).szejoza wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:09 pm imo viewtopic.php?f=95&t=26121
should be trashed asap, guy clearly knows nothing about skill
rampage is 20s when popped on yellow, 10s when popped in red. That proposal is just an attempt to nerf opposing side just for the sake of the nerf, he didn't even put too much effort to read the skill description
Dont feel like i have enough knowlege about the game to make proposal.peterthepan3 wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:14 pm Not a good idea to make this thread outside of balance forums. Think it's overperforming? Make a proposal where you outline: a) how it overperforms; b) what you would suggest altering it to.
Aside from Dabbart's viewtopic.php?f=95&t=25996 proposal, which is still in limbo, all the proposals have been less about balance and more about begging for a buff. People aren't going to beg for a nerf.peterthepan3 wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:14 pm Not a good idea to make this thread outside of balance forums. Think it's overperforming? Make a proposal where you outline: a) how it overperforms; b) what you would suggest altering it to.
I'll give it 1 more page before the powers that be descend upon you allJinxypie wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:20 pmDont feel like i have enough knowlege about the game to make proposal.peterthepan3 wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:14 pm Not a good idea to make this thread outside of balance forums. Think it's overperforming? Make a proposal where you outline: a) how it overperforms; b) what you would suggest altering it to.
Anyway can you wait with the lock till page 5 please?![]()
Fallenkezef is a trollcatholicism198 wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:29 pmAside from Dabbart's viewtopic.php?f=95&t=25996 proposal, which is still in limbo, all the proposals have been less about balance and more about begging for a buff. People aren't going to beg for a nerf.peterthepan3 wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:14 pm Not a good idea to make this thread outside of balance forums. Think it's overperforming? Make a proposal where you outline: a) how it overperforms; b) what you would suggest altering it to.
Heck, even the proposal I've been considering making has been about buffing Path of Da' Hitta and not about nerfing er- nothing to really nerf.
Fallenkezef's proposal is highly suspect. First, he doesn't actually have a 40/40+ Slayer, but just claims he did...not a 40/50- 40/60- but one that barely meets the requirements- why delete something you put so much work into? and when/if he did have one, the ability was perfectly fine and wasn't until he was on the receiving end that it became as issue of it over-performing. Again, no one is going to beg for a nerf.
Peter, if the standard that is being balanced around would be good play; atleast semi-min-max'd and well coordinated groups,peterthepan3 wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:31 pmI'll give it 1 more page before the powers that be descend upon you allJinxypie wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:20 pmDont feel like i have enough knowlege about the game to make proposal.peterthepan3 wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:14 pm Not a good idea to make this thread outside of balance forums. Think it's overperforming? Make a proposal where you outline: a) how it overperforms; b) what you would suggest altering it to.
Anyway can you wait with the lock till page 5 please?![]()
Good point, Cath. People won't ask for nerfs, which is a shame as it pretty much sums up how many people want 'balanced' PvP.
The 40/40 rule kinda guarantees that no one who has bothered to "main" the class to that rank is going to want their own class nerfed... Look at all the WLs opening suggestions regarding nerfing the Guardian pet on steroids spec or all the SMs who were volunteering to get rid of the double spirit debuff stack or now all the ASW players who agree that -180 init debuff is overpowered.peterthepan3 wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:31 pmI'll give it 1 more page before the powers that be descend upon you allJinxypie wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:20 pmDont feel like i have enough knowlege about the game to make proposal.peterthepan3 wrote: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:14 pm Not a good idea to make this thread outside of balance forums. Think it's overperforming? Make a proposal where you outline: a) how it overperforms; b) what you would suggest altering it to.
Anyway can you wait with the lock till page 5 please?![]()
Good point, Cath. People won't ask for nerfs, which is a shame as it pretty much sums up how many people want 'balanced' PvP.