Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 3:35 am
same thing, someone in our group have lock rewards someone no.aa91837 wrote:Something broken again? zone lock-no exp/rr/medals.
Page 19 of 27
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 3:45 am
I still remain 2 hours in praag taking obj, killing players and the lord keep.. on lock i received no influ, no renown and i rolled 2 with the classical cow ****.... this system is not clear, why my contribuition is so useless? Is this the right way to reward correctly the players who contributes activelly in rvr? For me is only an annoying way to leave the pvp maps.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:09 am
I like how rewarding R16 players with RR45 gear somehow became the norm in your minds and is perfectly acceptable there. What an interesting development. I hope you're all not too difficult in accepting the changes, because your arguments to revert them are embarrassing.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:12 am
Imho, rewards should be tied not to level, but RR.wargrimnir wrote:I like how rewarding R16 players with RR45 gear somehow became the norm in your minds and is perfectly acceptable there. What an interesting development. I hope you're all not too difficult in accepting the changes, because your arguments to revert them are embarrassing.
For example, my zealot (below 40) is RR52, which makes her Conquest ready since a while.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:15 am
Rewards should be based on who you're fighting. Fight conq wearers get conq. Fight t2 level people get soldiers. Just as it was on live. Reward based on challenge.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:18 am
Im high on RR but the things that personally bothering me atm is contributing AF in zone for couple hours or more and beside the Lord renown tick im getting nothing from the zone lock; Renown wise.wargrimnir wrote:I like how rewarding R16 players with RR45 gear somehow became the norm in your minds and is perfectly acceptable there. What an interesting development. I hope you're all not too difficult in accepting the changes, because your arguments to revert them are embarrassing.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:26 am
Alas, we are not like live. When you go out into the lakes as R16, you get a more significant bolster provided you wear gear appropriate for your level. Which is why it's important to win and wear, gear your level. If you try to scrub your way through in low level gear, you're gonna have a bad time.Telen wrote:Rewards should be based on who you're fighting. Fight conq wearers get conq. Fight t2 level people get soldiers. Just as it was on live. Reward based on challenge.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 7:01 am
Hello, i'm currently R38 RR55 and I got a gold bag from the last T4 session in DW (The mail with the bag stated Caledor tho). I toke a screenshot of the content of the gold bag(5 Officer Medallion, nothing else not even 1 silver) is it working as intended ?
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 7:11 am
I think there is a bug on T1. Was getting 530xp a tick holding the boat in Nordland.
Went from 15 to 16 in a few minutes.
Went from 15 to 16 in a few minutes.
Re: Patch Notes 2/02/2018
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 8:07 am
YEs , I will be possible with patcher , but if we do , we will only add new texture that are lore friendly .Darosh wrote:On the notion of standards:Grunbag wrote:Standard will give granted abilities and you’ll put tactic buff on it .... laterAnomanderake wrote:Sry, I can’t find the info... what are the standards supposed to do?
For now it’s just a role play thing
Would it be possible to allow for player created emblems (ofc, that would require some supervision or RoR would be riddled with various, colorful recreations of male genitals...in an instant upon implementation), or to expand on the emblems ingame in another way (maybe a new art contest *cough*)?
I guess client control and some and such would be required, not to mention that it'd be far off any priority ~ so just asking whether it has been considered yet.
