Re: FUSION - 6V6 Videos
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2017 1:27 pm
So this WL/WH combination.... i'm guessing it is the strongest now? Seen it a lot lately.
It's always been the comp we used. We experimented a bit during the .ab ex period for Shaman (WL pet = another target for lifetap = useless, essentially), but have gone back to normal comp. With a SM, it just synergises really well for burst-reliant comps.freshour wrote:So this WL/WH combination.... i'm guessing it is the strongest now? Seen it a lot lately.
Liar. There was the ol Magus / Melee Dok combo and the famous Magus / Magus combo.peterthepan3 wrote:It's always been the comp we used. We experimented a bit during the .ab ex period for Shaman (WL pet = another target for lifetap = useless, essentially), but have gone back to normal comp. With a SM, it just synergises really well for burst-reliant comps.freshour wrote:So this WL/WH combination.... i'm guessing it is the strongest now? Seen it a lot lately.
You know our love was never meant to be publicly broadcast.Tankbeardz wrote:Liar. There was the ol Magus / Melee Dok combo and the famous Magus / Magus combo.peterthepan3 wrote:It's always been the comp we used. We experimented a bit during the .ab ex period for Shaman (WL pet = another target for lifetap = useless, essentially), but have gone back to normal comp. With a SM, it just synergises really well for burst-reliant comps.freshour wrote:So this WL/WH combination.... i'm guessing it is the strongest now? Seen it a lot lately.
Boo. I do enjoy those more than FoTM setups. 2 closely skilled / geared FoTM groups going at it always turns into a 30 minute grind fest with 2 DBs.peterthepan3 wrote:You know our love was never meant to be publicly broadcast.Tankbeardz wrote:Liar. There was the ol Magus / Melee Dok combo and the famous Magus / Magus combo.peterthepan3 wrote:
It's always been the comp we used. We experimented a bit during the .ab ex period for Shaman (WL pet = another target for lifetap = useless, essentially), but have gone back to normal comp. With a SM, it just synergises really well for burst-reliant comps.
Tankbeardz wrote:peterthepan3 wrote:Tankbeardz wrote:
2 closely skilled
hahahaRida wrote:Tankbeardz wrote:peterthepan3 wrote:
after watching 2:52-2:58 i wouldn't be that cocky, captain two-shot.Rida wrote:
LoB lost to pugs, confirmed.Simtex wrote:i dont consider you a premade xD. you are same 6 pugs who usually play togheter(but ofc not a premade, always with wrong setup, 1 guy not good enough, 1 guys is 12 yo, 1 had cold, 1 hand pinky sprained)
the only record you held was "highest RR", "most morale cheese", "best fodg spam" and "best gear".Simtex wrote:i think we hold some record in wiping fusion in under 1 minute, anyone else can top it?'
this time it didn't. guess the best tank relies too much on m4? choppas pressure was non-existent, could replace him already with grobbok imho.Simtex wrote:We also have the best tanks, and choppa on server, helps aswell dont it?
those who could close the gear gap, i count 3 nowadays.Simtex wrote:Only 2 guilds managed to deal with our pressure
what would have happened if fusion had a slayer instead of the WL? i can only imagine ...Simtex wrote:Any order guild who run what the like to call META groups is doing it all wrong, order META doesnt contain a WL, its either 1-3-2 or 2-2-2 with Slayer/SW. Slayer/WH
That means LoB just got outskilled by: 1 guy not good enough, 1 guys is 12 yo, 1 had cold, 1 hand pinky sprained?Simtex wrote:WH/WL setup are garbage(against ultrameta mara/chop). But they work against opponents you outskill.
he would have helped you to deal with the pressure of the so called META group who does it all wrong.Simtex wrote:just some random sham in backline spamming FoDG, no brain involved.
time for new memes i guess, want me to make some?Rida wrote:![]()