Page 14 of 15

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:16 am
by peterthepan3
simtex wrote:
DnD farmed their gear, beat us once with 65+ toon. Gear and RR is easy to comeby in this game if you know how to properly farm AAO.

We played with same for over a 1 year, SAME people. ALWAYS practicing, you think all of that was overperforming FoDG or coordination?

It was equally OP for both sides. Dont try to put off your failures on OP game mechanics, cause that is what META is.
I remember fighting/beating you with 2 zealots aswell.
1) I didn't say anything about acquisiton of gear (it is relatively easy to get, I agree), I just stated that you guys were rr70+. Is that wrong?

2) No of course not, you guys have very good synergy, but that doesn't negate from the fact that 'certain' things were/are overperforming. I had hoped, in a utopian world, that bloodbath would be free of any overperforming mechanics (hence why I made one or two threads asking what people thought of the inclusion of ab ex AM/SH), or that we could have made an effort to try and minimalise them. I didn't do it insidiously, or to target any one guild; anyone who knows me will vouch when I say that I only cared about achieving balanced PvP, yet that was an impossible task I soon discovered.

3) What's with the little attacks, brosephine? You have a better core 6 than us, given that for the past year or so - we haven't had a core 6. If you're genuinely boasting about beating a group consisting of randoms/pick-ups with little synergy & RR40 half the time, then good for you.

OT: we need more DPS IBs. D=

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:17 am
by Haojin
Image

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:28 am
by simtex
peterthepan3 wrote:
simtex wrote:
DnD farmed their gear, beat us once with 65+ toon. Gear and RR is easy to comeby in this game if you know how to properly farm AAO.

We played with same for over a 1 year, SAME people. ALWAYS practicing, you think all of that was overperforming FoDG or coordination?

It was equally OP for both sides. Dont try to put off your failures on OP game mechanics, cause that is what META is.
I remember fighting/beating you with 2 zealots aswell.
1) I didn't say anything about acquisiton of gear (it is relatively easy to get, I agree), I just stated that you guys were rr70+. Is that wrong?

2) No of course not, you guys have very good synergy, but that doesn't negate from the fact that 'certain' things were/are overperforming. I had hoped, in a utopian world, that bloodbath would be free of any overperforming mechanics (hence why I made one or two threads asking what people thought of the inclusion of ab ex AM/SH), or that we could have made an effort to try and minimalise them. I didn't do it insidiously, or to target any one guild; anyone who knows me will vouch when I say that I only cared about achieving balanced PvP, yet that was an impossible task I soon discovered.

3) What's with the little attacks, brosephine? You have a better core 6 than us, given that for the past year or so - we haven't had a core 6. If you're genuinely boasting about beating a group consisting of randoms/pick-ups with little synergy & RR40 half the time, then good for you.
you had core 6 when conq realeased that we fought.

my original post didnt contain anything about fighting fusion, cause i dont consider you a premade xD. you are same 6 pugs who usually play togheter(but ofc not a premade, always with wrong setup, 1 guy not good enough, 1 guys is 12 yo, 1 had cold, 1 hand pinky sprained)

now i lost alot of fights on my time with this server, enigma killed us in seconds, just like we kill you. but we stuck together, and practiced and now you can see the results.

but ya, we pretty much got 6 ppl together, made NB strings and smashed our heads on keyboards and beat every group on server. just some random sham in backline spamming FoDG, no brain involved.

i think we hold some record in wiping fusion in under 1 minute, anyone else can top it?'

/popcorn

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:37 am
by Haojin
simtex wrote: 1 guys is 12
so he shouldn't play the last year at all. i don't know when his birthday tho.
Spoiler:
Image

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 11:55 am
by Danord

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:04 pm
by Penril
How the hell did this thread derail so badly?

Why do you guys have to bring your 6v6 crap here? If you beat someone, why can't you just be cool about it? Why the necessity to measure epeens? Are you sure there is only one 12 year old player involved in this? You are all acting like one.

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:07 pm
by Aurandilaz
Penril wrote:How the hell did this thread derail so badly?

Why do you guys have to bring your 6v6 crap here? If you beat someone, why can't you just be cool about it? Why the necessity to measure epeens? Are you sure there is only one 12 year old player involved in this? You are all acting like one.
it's the final showdown between the last two remaining boybands left on the server, who gets the final word out will be forever remembered as THE BOYBAND, so in 50 years they can tell stories to their grandchildren about them being the last good 6man left on the server

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 1:05 pm
by shaggyboomboom
Penril wrote:How the hell did this thread derail so badly?

Why do you guys have to bring your 6v6 crap here? If you beat someone, why can't you just be cool about it? Why the necessity to measure epeens? Are you sure there is only one 12 year old player involved in this? You are all acting like one.
its the golden boyz vs the **** boyz, leave it be!

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 1:07 pm
by GodlessCrom
Such pro players on low pop server of uncompetitive game. From all the **** talk simtex is pulling, you'd think he was good at a game that matters or something :lol:

Re: Order: Tank discussion

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 1:23 pm
by Collateral
This thread quickly turned into an ego trip of a certain player.