Give it a rest.Avanos wrote: Fri Jun 12, 2026 8:17 pmSpoiler:
So your big gotcha is that over multiple years I've occasionally suggested balance changes?
Congratulations, you've successfully discovered that I participate in balance discussions on a balance forum.
The question isn't whether balance changes should ever happen.
The question is whether every time someone loses a matchup the answer is immediately "nerf it."
In the example you quoted, my answer was literally the opposite:
"Adapt your playstyle."
Which is especially relevant considering we're currently in a thread called "Nerf WE/WH into the ground."
I openly acknowledged a matchup my build struggles with and my conclusion wasn't "nerf DPS RP into the ground." It was "adapt, choose your fights, and play around the matchup."
You spent more effort digging through years of my post history than addressing that argument.
Ironically, the fact that you had to leave the actual discussion and go archaeology through old posts suggests you couldn't find much wrong with the point being made here.
You said “adapt” whilst playing a broken class that easily lets you adapt.
You said you didn’t ask for nerfs, yet you did.
If by suggesting balance changes you mention nerfs to classes you struggle with (DPS RP) or struggled with (Skirmish SW before you got double pounce), then do us all a favour and also see how broken WE is and suggest balance changes to that, rather than relentlessly defending it.
It’s ok to call for nerfs to other classes, but not your own?
Hypocrisy 101



