Return of Reckoning

well frankly the renown from wining scenarios is decent now and even could surpass the amount you could get from orvr. So kills reduced renown is no issue imo
If devs keep win/lose renown ratio 15k/4-6k that is good step. Next to do is to increase crest gains to match renown gains

If you think people go for kills for the sake of renown, I have bad news for you.

I don't know who is spreading this delusion. It's a PvP game, people want to kill and not run around with boxes for hours.

Hazmy wrote: Sun May 24, 2026 4:56 am If you think people go for kills for the sake of renown, I have bad news for you.

I don't know who is spreading this delusion. It's a PvP game, people want to kill and not run around with boxes for hours.

At the same time it is logical that battle objectives in SCs should generate the greatest reward?

Nerf everything, so new people will be able to catch up after 5 years.

Box mechanic is lame and needs to go.

It also promotes blobbing as the best method is to blob 2 BOs, wait to spawn like 4+ boxes, and them move as a blob back to the keep.

Single players running as box at a time is a pretty minimal part of how keeps get ranked.

...and why anyone would solo run boxes, with so many WE/WH?

Not a single thing would change if the OP's proposition (theoretically & in parallel universe) would get implemented in terms of WBs play. Im pretty sure 80% of folks playing oRvR dont do it for renown

Moreover, increasing renown for BOs/Boxes to compensate the renown loss from kills would only benefit low level solos, which im not sure a healthy thing to do in a competitive, non-homogenized PvP game.