Page 2 of 2
Re: Self-advertising issue
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:55 pm
by zabis
Can we get a price on that?
Re: Self-advertising issue
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:05 pm
by Vilhelmina
You'd probably need to win the upcoming Euro lottery.
Re: Self-advertising issue
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:14 pm
by Dajciekrwi
imao, its not the matter of money. After Age of Sigmar, RoR is a relict of past, a concept against new politics of GW comapny. So " not because, not" will be the answer, im afraid.
Re: Self-advertising issue
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:14 pm
by Tiggo
Libra wrote:I talked yesterday with GW personell regarding Age of Sigmar and ROR came up. They're thrilled to see it's alive and that the players are taking a step to make the game better what the original Devs did not.
Some are in fact downloading it (likely) to experince real WAR!
well there is personell (low managemant staff, developers, art guys etc.) and then there is PERSONELL (ceo, lawyers, legal department staff, high management, strategic deciders etc.) one not condeming this project does not mean the others wont ... unfortunatly in legal business rational is NO Argument to ANYONE.... SADLY...
Re: Self-advertising issue
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:30 pm
by zulnam
If the developers control 51% of the IP they are the majority shareholder. Negotiating from that position is a completely different beast. That and GW would probably not refuse a deal in which they get some money ('cause, if ROR starts making money, they would) as well as positive publicity without spending a dime.
(i don't think the Sigmar thingy is such a big thing; WO:AOR is a nieche game)
Again, if people have contacted GW and they would give us our blessing... It's time to contact... the other one...
Re: Self-advertising issue
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 3:48 pm
by Mez
zabis wrote:Can we get a price on that?
You wouldn't even pay $15 to play DAOC with me. So I say to you, Hush yo mouth