Page 2 of 10
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:19 pm
by Minisynn
Neznan wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:10 pm
Ninjagon wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 7:05 pm
What is this?
Something is wrong
will Devs give Bans for those dwarfs, who using this exploit ?
Which part of it exactly is an exploit? Explain in detail

Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:29 pm
by Neznan
Minisynn wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:19 pm
Neznan wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:10 pm
Ninjagon wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 7:05 pm
What is this?
Something is wrong
will Devs give Bans for those dwarfs, who using this exploit ?
Which part of it exactly is an exploit? Explain in detail
Tell me if you really believes nothing wrong here
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 pm
by marquisxxx
When you know something is not working as intended and yet you continue to abuse it, it's exploiting.
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:33 pm
by Minisynn
marquisxxx wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 pm
When you know something is not working as intended and yet you continue to abuse it, it's exploiting.
How is it not working as intended? It's been this way for over a year
It's funny, LNM were on Destro tonight and none of them are complaining on here - because they actually just figured out how to counter it and murdered our cheesy RP wb all night instead of just complaining about how it's an "exploit"

Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:35 pm
by Neznan
Minisynn wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:33 pm
marquisxxx wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 pm
When you know something is not working as intended and yet you continue to abuse it, it's exploiting.
How is it not working as intended? It's been this way for over a year
game's exploit could exist for a very long time, but it does not means people can/must use it
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:36 pm
by Gegga
what part of it is not intended?
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:37 pm
by Minisynn
Neznan wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:35 pm
Minisynn wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:33 pm
marquisxxx wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 pm
When you know something is not working as intended and yet you continue to abuse it, it's exploiting.
How is it not working as intended? It's been this way for over a year
game's exploit could exist for a very long time, but it does not means people can/must use it
So basically, it's an exploit because you don't like it? Because you're really giving absolutely zero argument here for what's actually exploiting about using game mechanics in their intended way, but just stacking a shitload of one class to do it lol
Obviously it's super cheesy but it's literally countered by just charging at the RPs and flattening them because they have no guards and practically zero ability to kite

Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:38 pm
by khorne8kill
my personal opinion should be that ROB should not be stackable or you will just have every RP using it in a choke point on one tank and wiping full WBs
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:39 pm
by Mayombe
Everything is disrespectful and wastes my time. I have over 9,000 health and I die in 2 seconds. It's unacceptable. I don't like opportunists.
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:42 pm
by Neznan
Mayombe wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:39 pm
Everything is disrespectful and wastes my time. I have over 9,000 health and I die in 2 seconds. It's unacceptable. I don't like opportunists.
gentlmen above say that nothing wrong her, working as intended.