Re: The misconception about Engi/magi
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2021 4:24 pm
Magus can DoT many people in 1 cast. His DoTs will damage for 100-150 damage but multiply it by 24/48 and you will soon realise what all that damage is.
Warhammer Online
https://returnofreckoning.com/forum/
Yes... the 70 DB's and 8mil damage Shiro pulled was all fluff.Shanell wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 3:53 pm I just want to ask - what were the numbers of healing done during these city sieges? I bet 1 toof that they were much higher than in mirros with no maguses/engis because these damage numbers are fluff damage.
Rowanmantle wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 4:25 pmYes... the 70 DB's and 8mil damage Shiro pulled was all fluff.Shanell wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 3:53 pm I just want to ask - what were the numbers of healing done during these city sieges? I bet 1 toof that they were much higher than in mirros with no maguses/engis because these damage numbers are fluff damage.![]()
The world doesnt revolve around 24v24.wonshot wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 3:24 pm Because the last few months Magus holds the record with 11mil damage done in instance1 premade vs premade.
And a couple of engineers have pulled simular numbers in premade vs premade involving some of the best players on the server against them.
Well I do not play engie myself, and to my knowledge this was not a pug/mediocre warband it was 2 12 mans we faced. Sadly we had the upper hand with the composition.Schweedy wrote: Fri Apr 30, 2021 7:52 amRowanmantle wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 4:25 pmYes... the 70 DB's and 8mil damage Shiro pulled was all fluff.Shanell wrote: Fri Mar 19, 2021 3:53 pm I just want to ask - what were the numbers of healing done during these city sieges? I bet 1 toof that they were much higher than in mirros with no maguses/engis because these damage numbers are fluff damage.![]()
It is laughable to even suggest that the performance of a few elite Engis (and 1 Magus) vs PUG instances and scenarios should automatically warrant inclusion into a serious balancing dialog.
Ridiculous assumptions being made here over a class based on nit-picked instances of single-digit, high-performing Engis/Magus, with alliances that structure their warband play around these optimally geared players to succeed vs PuG warbands and other mediocre alliance warbands. Can anyone here see the forest for the trees at all?
The class problem is an issue that must be looked at as holistically as possible, rather than through the myopic lenses people in these forums like to rely on with a heavy dose of confirmation bias. PUG Forts/Instances can, and often do, revert to a veritable hellscape against sides that capitalize on the inherent advantages afforded to their classes in the most optimal way possible. If you use PUG instances to make any class-based critiqued, you deserve to be laughed at.
This is what a common PUG/mediocre wb hellscape looks like in this game. If you haven't been in the receiving end, you haven't lived.
DBs [IC1 3-27-2021] _________ DMG______________________ Healing ___________________Protection
![]()
Also Magus=/=Engi. What they each bring to the table is dependent on how they are utilized, and sorry to break the news to y'all, but Engi brings much more to the table than Rift in terms of group viability.
Much more than what Magus could even hope for in RvR.
EDIT: I just realized Rowanmantle was a part of that IC instance. You tell me man... you tell me. How's that meta looking? Feels good right?