[Suggestion] Split RvR into 1-39 (t1+t2) and 40 (t3+t4)

Share your ideas and feedback to help improve the game.
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.

This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.

To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Vaul
Posts: 353

Re: [Suggestion] Split RvR into 1-39 (t1+t2) and 40 (t3+t4)

Post#11 » Wed Nov 11, 2020 10:40 am

We should also balance any concerns about splitting into more tiers affecting current population against concerns about growing new player base.
Deadlakes (Marauder)
Shoreditch (Zealot)
Vhannos (Chosen)

Ads
User avatar
Lesnoj
Posts: 67

Re: [Suggestion] Split RvR into 1-39 (t1+t2) and 40 (t3+t4)

Post#12 » Wed Nov 11, 2020 11:03 am

Before merging zones was a good idea because there weren't so many people on the server, but this times are gone. So splitting tiers is a good idea now. No matter the fact that some maps are not build to have so many players. So the zones are often overcrowded and lowbies that are running around are not worth killing and for them it should be boring, being easy killed by rr70+
Image

M0rw47h
Posts: 898

Re: [Suggestion] Split RvR into 1-39 (t1+t2) and 40 (t3+t4)

Post#13 » Wed Nov 11, 2020 12:12 pm

I enjoy playing my "t2/3" characters with 40 guildies passing me all medalions :cry:

User avatar
Bignusty
Posts: 454

Re: [Suggestion] Split RvR into 1-39 (t1+t2) and 40 (t3+t4)

Post#14 » Wed Nov 11, 2020 12:35 pm

Im agree ! When there are more than 500 players on small zone like t2 its unplayable keep are untakable and there are huge lag spike . Whit the high number of players <40 i think they are gonna have more fun to play whitout all zerg lvl 40 rr70+ on those small zone .

T3-T4 zone are best way to play for lvl 40 cause map way bigger than t2 .

User avatar
dwyur
Posts: 86
Contact:

Re: [Suggestion] Split RvR into 1-39 (t1+t2) and 40 (t3+t4)

Post#15 » Wed Nov 11, 2020 1:06 pm

if population was back at 3k this would work, but uhh no way i think is this a good change with where population's at
Dirkfunk - 83 Runepriest
Dwyur - 82 Sorc | Deloused - 70 DoK | Durtknap- 64 Choppa

Dwarni
Posts: 74

Re: [Suggestion] Split RvR into 1-39 (t1+t2) and 40 (t3+t4)

Post#16 » Wed Nov 11, 2020 2:06 pm

Even with this population, there are more than enough players.

Has this server ever had 3000 concurrent players?

User avatar
wargrimnir
Head Game Master
Posts: 8398
Contact:

Re: [Suggestion] Split RvR into 1-39 (t1+t2) and 40 (t3+t4)

Post#17 » Wed Nov 11, 2020 2:08 pm

We have answered this question before. The answer hasn't changed. You're stuck with T2+ for the foreseeable future.
Image
[email protected] for exploits and cheaters.
grimnir.me Some old WAR blog

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests