Return of Reckoning

I think I might be decent, or at least I'd love to be, probably bad, really.

satekh wrote:I think I might be decent, or at least I'd love to be, probably bad, really.

Nah, you're great, mate! <3

(Where is great on the list!????)

6-mans of semi-organised players (pugs) beating organised 6-mans/zergs = top of foodchain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gEDtoQBu9w

A 15-tier scale? How about a 10-tier scale...unless you can give some definition and examples of really good through pro.

I also think I'd rather be an okay than a bad! Lol!!

A true pro is someone who knows his class inside out, who can lead people in coordinated 6-mans/warbands, who can duel with his class. that's my take anyway

jonathanmurphy3 wrote:A true pro is someone who knows his class inside out, who can lead people in coordinated 6-mans/warbands, who can duel with his class. that's my take anyway

Who can duel and win those fights,that he normally shouldnt :>

My former Guildmaster was quite a good Warband(sometimes also Dual or Triple WBs)-leader and had a pretty good knowledge about what he was doing, but he wasnt as suited for 6v6 fights like my own small group i had. On the other hand there are ppl who can lead 6mans (but not Warbands/Zergs) that i'd still consider Pro. But well, theres missing one Type of person in this foodchain. The person that ain't a pro, but everyone likes to play with, since hes still pretty decent/nice/cute/funny or whatever. What i mean is that normally Pros only play with Pros, while zerglings play with other pugs/zergers. But there are sometimes ppl who get 'carried' from other Pros simply for the person he/she is

jonathanmurphy3 wrote:A true pro is someone who knows his class inside out, who can lead people in coordinated 6-mans/warbands, who can duel with his class. that's my take anyway

Dueling doesn't count. Seriously. Mostly because some classes are stupidly broken or OP in 1v1.

I was killing rr100 sorcs on my rr40 AM. Does that mean i am a pro? Does that mean the other guy was terrible? No, it just means AMs are >>>>>>>>>> Sorcs in 1v1.

I do however agree with the first part of your post, specially the "leading people" part. There is nothing more satisfying than running in a group, getting wiped, ask everyone "what spec are you running?", notice they have a TERRIBLE spec, teach them to spec properly, tell them what skills and targets should be a priority in a fight, then fighting against the ones who wiped you, and kicking their asses.

^ you should have tried dueling my brother Neuropol. Don't think he ever failed to maintain a 50%+ win ratio against AMs. it's all about the player. and most sorcs were very bad.

agreed on the rest.

Here we go with the "duelling is balanced" gig.

Nah not that, it's just you can't duel one person of class X, beat them, and assume that class Y > X based on bad examples of class X.