Re: Battlegrounds from 1 to 39
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:02 pm
From a North American perspective, this would help mid-level sc pop a lot. It's basically impossible to get mid-level pops in the evening.
Why lvling in this old game is very boring, simple. Why have pve in this server? To many player? More Lag? You play one 10 years old game and wait the pve? WTF!mogt wrote: Wed Nov 28, 2018 4:27 am why you want the easy going way? this game was ever a combination between pve and PVP/SC/RVR.
the devs do a very good job for players that they can do pve, they fixing the quests, implemantion dungeons. why you just see the pvp areas, you should be expanse your horizont
When was the last time you did midtier sc?Nefarian78 wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:44 pm
16-31 would be a better range. No new players getting stomped and all classes have at the very least some of their core abilities.
Is it? Last time i did a scenario before t4 was like 2+years ago, since doing sc is a complete waste of time when leveling. Thanks for correcting me thenSulorie wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:17 pmWhen was the last time you did midtier sc?Nefarian78 wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:44 pm
16-31 would be a better range. No new players getting stomped and all classes have at the very least some of their core abilities.
The current bracket is already 16-30.
When you don't want to end with rr20 at rank 40, then sc are actually the best way to get xp and rp alike.Nefarian78 wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:37 pmIs it? Last time i did a scenario before t4 was like 2+years ago, since doing sc is a complete waste of time when leveling. Thanks for correcting me thenSulorie wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:17 pmWhen was the last time you did midtier sc?Nefarian78 wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:44 pm
16-31 would be a better range. No new players getting stomped and all classes have at the very least some of their core abilities.
The current bracket is already 16-30.
Not really. If that's the case, why does everyone prefer doing RvR? On my t1 character i'm leveling right now, a won scenario gives me slightly more xp than completing a quest. It takes 2 times as much time and more importantly, you don't win all your scenarios.Sulorie wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:04 pm When you don't want to end with rr20 at rank 40, then sc are actually the best way to get xp and rp alike.![]()
My question would be why are you even giving input on something you clearly have no interest or experience in?Nefarian78 wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:20 pmNot really. If that's the case, why does everyone prefer doing RvR? On my t1 character i'm leveling right now, a won scenario gives me slightly more xp than completing a quest. It takes 2 times as much time and more importantly, you don't win all your scenarios.Sulorie wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:04 pm When you don't want to end with rr20 at rank 40, then sc are actually the best way to get xp and rp alike.![]()
Scenarios are so irrelevant during leveling that i haven't queued one in more than 2 years and completely forgot the 16-31 bracket even existed. Scenario rewards need to be buffed a lot. Not that it will ever happen.
PvE gives you more experience than scenarios or RvR. Scenarios give you more exp than RvR and way more renown than PvP.Nefarian78 wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:20 pmNot really. If that's the case, why does everyone prefer doing RvR? On my t1 character i'm leveling right now, a won scenario gives me slightly more xp than completing a quest. It takes 2 times as much time and more importantly, you don't win all your scenarios.Sulorie wrote: Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:04 pm When you don't want to end with rr20 at rank 40, then sc are actually the best way to get xp and rp alike.![]()
Scenarios are so irrelevant during leveling that i haven't queued one in more than 2 years and completely forgot the 16-31 bracket even existed. Scenario rewards need to be buffed a lot. Not that it will ever happen.