Page 2 of 2
Re: Slayer in IB armor issue
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:15 am
by Marley
When I implemented armor for cosmetic purposes (Costmetic token sets) this set was implemented for the sake of role playing and therefore a version for Slayer and one for IB so that you could have the melee regiment to look the same but wear different weapons to distinguish them.
Therefore I would say to remove it because it should only be avail through those tokens (which I belive have not been added yet) not because the hammerer look is too far from slayer.
Re: Slayer in IB armor issue
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:55 am
by normanis
atleast now i can say slayer wear medium armor not run around naked with trousers from linen.
pity mythic didnt make hammerer and kisilev faction for order.
Re: Slayer in IB armor issue
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 11:41 am
by Scrilian
And ppl still think that BOrk with 2 choppas is a good thing >_<
Re: Slayer in IB armor issue
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:20 pm
by Gotrek129
I know thats why I posted it. IDK why ppl got problem they made slayers amrors looks like it look. It is Warhammer uniwerse and Slayers was like that. They was looking for Heoric death, mostly they wasnt carring their look. They were just looking for death in Battle.
Re: Slayer in IB armor issue
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:25 pm
by Gotrek129
True Slayers

Re: Slayer in IB armor issue
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 11:03 pm
by TenTonHammer
Scrilian wrote:And ppl still think that BOrk with 2 choppas is a good thing >_<
not all of us are incapeable of distinquishing classes like you
because we play our huds on
:^)