Warhammer Online: 1.4.9 Patch Notes on PTS

[Glorian]

I have played my engie to much on that account. On retail the instantcast was almost a must.
You need the turret and you need it when the shooting starts.
But by equiping the instacast you had to skip other more usefull tactics. So in the end the damage buff on the turret was eaten away by the need of the tactic.

So If it is posdible to add instacast as a passive buff it would help the engie through t3.
Or was anyone of you scared of engineers in T4?

[dkabib]

If that goes on, please don't forget that for Magus as well. I see they suffer the same problem.

[Glorian]

I havent played the magus. It is the summining of this deamon thing, right?

[Sulorie]

If there's a tactic slot which makes deploying instant cast, I can simply make the tactic buff a passive, if you believe that buff to the classes is required?

No, the tactic does more than making resummon instant. It saves a lot AP as well.
Adding a passive buff isn't removing the need for this tactic for mobile specs but reduces its value.

[wos]

I have played my engie to much on that account. On retail the instantcast was almost a must.
You need the turret and you need it when the shooting starts.
But by equiping the instacast you had to skip other more usefull tactics. So in the end the damage buff on the turret was eaten away by the need of the tactic.

So If it is posdible to add instacast as a passive buff it would help the engie through t3.
Or was anyone of you scared of engineers in T4?

yes engis were mean in t4 and t3 wb/sorks were ezey kill them engis need some skill there allway pulling some move out there ass annnddd then u dead or even if u win you still going to die a few secs after. ( engi respwans in wc see renown tic laugh to him self)

[dkabib]

Yeah it makes Redeploy cost no Action Points, but Redeploy isn't reliable how it is now.
And considering that as the notes on 1.4.9 are, it would be an ok and very welcome change.

[Sulorie]

1.4.9 isn't thought through anyway.

Just fix redeploy. Make it 150ft range and destroy turret, when leaving max range. Same for magus.

[Glorian]

That is the instacast tactic on the magus:
http://waronlinebuilder.org/#career=mag ... 9:;0:0:0:0:

That is the instacast tactic on the engineer:
http://waronlinebuilder.org/#career=eng ... 4:;0:0:0:0:

Please make both a passive boost. Oder and destro See updated. No bonus only on one side.

[wos]

the bw/sork sounds like a dps buff wich they don't need. a good bw/sork can burn ur face off in a few sec with out heals

engi/mages there is a tactic so this is pointless there a good class good dps tuff as play them well and spec for what u want to do and ur set

sm/bo love them the way they are. love that bubble but seriously a sm with no bubble proc is just lame and the ability to hold a group of 6 at a bo in a sc till ur teem caps the rest with a grate sword Ahhh the sounded it make when u hit things. Don't care about all this not having group support to me they do u just got to do it the ib/bg chosen/kobs do it passvly. Where the sm you got to go out and do it to save your group much beater filling when u bust a melay train off ur healers or when u solo heal a sc and win with ur group heal tactic. ( epic win ) alot of premades ran sm in t4 because they dont offer a stat buff/debuff (in t4 this is not much of a diffens there only cansling out a buff from an other class and most are in soft or hard cap ) the sm/bo is more of a taticle tank that haze alot of skills to save your group in a tite spot a sm/bo can make a sc teem

[dkabib]

engi/mages there is a tactic so this is pointless there a good class good dps tuff as play them well and spec for what u want to do and ur set

The whole point of this discussion is that using a tactic for that is too much. Just because there is a way around it, doesn't mean it is a good one.