
Changelog 20/02
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Re: Changelog 20/02
Yea and a small hint why wouldn't hurt 

Вальтер Рыжий RU => Gaziraga BW, Valefar WL, Lovejoy
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos

Ads
Re: Changelog 20/02
Scrilian wrote:Yea and a small hint why wouldn't hurt
well this is easy,its easily exploited for buffing with buff bots etc. (though it could be changed to that when a buff is applied WITHIN a scenario buffs stay even if changing group).
- Martock - Tiggo - Antigonos - Mago - Hamilkar - Melquart
- Smooshie (Destro)
- Smooshie (Destro)
Re: Changelog 20/02
I would like to comment on the bunny hoping exploit and something I have noticed with this patch.
The majority of classes that get away from the melee using a bunny hop, get away with one hop, this does stop classes from hoping to gain additional distance. I am starting to think a melee damage multiplier might be appropriate as well, if you are jumping in combat you tend to open yourself punishment...but that is just an idea and in no way a fleshed out solution.
The majority of classes that get away from the melee using a bunny hop, get away with one hop, this does stop classes from hoping to gain additional distance. I am starting to think a melee damage multiplier might be appropriate as well, if you are jumping in combat you tend to open yourself punishment...but that is just an idea and in no way a fleshed out solution.

Re: Changelog 20/02
Calling that an exploit(buff-bots) sounds to me a bit far-fetched.
Вальтер Рыжий RU => Gaziraga BW, Valefar WL, Lovejoy
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos

Re: Changelog 20/02
Scrilian wrote:Calling that an exploit(buff-bots) sounds to me a bit far-fetched.
another aproach: letting buffing happen out of group makes those buffs superior to the only in group auras e.g.
- Martock - Tiggo - Antigonos - Mago - Hamilkar - Melquart
- Smooshie (Destro)
- Smooshie (Destro)
Re: Changelog 20/02
It is
If RP or AM buffs you at sc, after sc all buffs remains
Sometimes,random people could ask you to buff them, so you had to invite them for a buff, then they could leave party. So i don't know why this change either.

If RP or AM buffs you at sc, after sc all buffs remains

Sometimes,random people could ask you to buff them, so you had to invite them for a buff, then they could leave party. So i don't know why this change either.
Re: Changelog 20/02
alredy pointed out this some month ago but "some" ppl suggested was not this way which is false as
lol
let enter bw and make buff 2x slayer then let him out and have 2x slayer be able to do even more procs while procs on their ID procs.
It was this way until some point it got fixed in 1.4 or even before to not allow this such of bad behaviour.
lol
let enter bw and make buff 2x slayer then let him out and have 2x slayer be able to do even more procs while procs on their ID procs.
It was this way until some point it got fixed in 1.4 or even before to not allow this such of bad behaviour.

Ads
Re: Changelog 20/02
And why this behaviour is bad, Tesq?
Re: Changelog 20/02
are joke right?Soulcheg wrote:And why this behaviour is bad, Tesq?
make bw enter buff 2x slayer exit and then let em spam mean bw does not have a reson to be in party, it's just not only make whats better even better! is even a reason to use worst class good stuff with out have worst class inside party.
1 slayer can't buff bw partys but bw can so just use 2x slayer or anyother class that can exploit this flaw to have an 3rd part out of party advantage.(this is the very exemple of what happened on live 2x slayer with be procs + 2xwp proc spamming undefitable id aoe + shatter limbs.
it's calling exploiting at my house.
Last edited by Tesq on Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests