I explained on page 6, we're not in a state to do that.peterthepan3 wrote:OT: when is the first wb vs 6v6 event gonna take place
WB vs 6v6.
Re: WB vs 6v6.
Ads
- peterthepan3
- Posts: 6509
Re: WB vs 6v6.
Lileldys wrote:I explained on page 6, we're not in a state to do that.peterthepan3 wrote:OT: when is the first wb vs 6v6 event gonna take place
that's a shame! we really wanted to have a warband vs 6 v 6 event!

Re: WB vs 6v6.
im threatening no one exept the thread itself as 1 of the main rule of the forum and every forum is not start a flame which for me this very thread was a little attempt--> bait ppl into flamepeterthepan3 wrote:Tesq wrote:peterthepan3 wrote:^ doesn't get the fact that this is all banter! The WB guilds and 6mans love eachother, and we're talking about running 4 guilds vs a wb guild as a joke! why you gotta be so angry?
This is just flaming around while we wait for t4.
P.s. Stop post image regarding ppl for your own sake man.
Why? Because everyone else can take a joke here and you're going to threaten me because you can't take banter?
![]()
As such it should be locked for me.

-
- Posts: 91
Re: WB vs 6v6.
That would be interesting, but i guess some guild Wb's prefer to farm pug's /random wb's so.. yeahpeterthepan3 wrote:Lileldys wrote:I explained on page 6, we're not in a state to do that.peterthepan3 wrote:OT: when is the first wb vs 6v6 event gonna take place
that's a shame! we really wanted to have a warband vs 6 v 6 event!

Re: WB vs 6v6.
From what i have seen so far, no one is flaming anyone here (except that guy who was attacking gankbus, but they can take care of themselves). This thread is kinda fun actually.Tesq wrote:
im threatening no one exept the thread itself as 1 of the main rule of the forum and every forum is not start a flame which for me this very thread was a little attempt--> bait ppl into flame
As such it should be locked for me.
And it is much better to talk about WB/6v6 here than just derailing all the other threads with the same thing over and over and over.
Re: WB vs 6v6.
As i said this was a flame attempt and not a a succesfull flame thread (in general regard that matter of 6 men vs wbs) but for me it should recive the same treatment-> be lock.
The fact that otherwise ppl will derail anyother and last thread of the forum would not be sufficent to not lock it.
The fact that otherwise ppl will derail anyother and last thread of the forum would not be sufficent to not lock it.

- peterthepan3
- Posts: 6509
Re: WB vs 6v6.
Tesq wrote:As i said this was a flame attempt and not a a succesfull flame thread (in general regard that matter of 6 men vs wbs) but for me it should recive the same treatment-> be lock.
The fact that otherwise ppl will derail anyother and last thread of the forum would not be sufficent to not lock it.


Ads
Re: WB vs 6v6.
Yeh, we haven't fought another guild before.dontcomplainx wrote:That would be interesting, but i guess some guild Wb's prefer to farm pug's /random wb's so.. yeah
Destro - Porn Factory, Blood Dragons?, Nazgul, Chlopi Chaosu, Soul Reapers, Tempest Wolves, Gothic Society,
Order - GreenFire, Beavers, Inquisitors Alliance, FUREUR
Just to name a few
Re: WB vs 6v6.
perhaps no more clown meme, oh sy you are alredy a clown and your image even show it my badpeterthepan3 wrote:Tesq wrote:As i said this was a flame attempt and not a a succesfull flame thread (in general regard that matter of 6 men vs wbs) but for me it should recive the same treatment-> be lock.
The fact that otherwise ppl will derail anyother and last thread of the forum would not be sufficent to not lock it.7

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Moonbiter and 16 guests