Pounce is working as it should. OF course, you know better than Aza, why don't you tell him to fix it now, cause you demand it, huh?Vdova wrote: Pounce now is broken as I sayd.
WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
Ads
Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
Pounce doesnt work as on live. On live nobody were able to jump on the keep walls, trust me I have tried it on my WL many timesSoulcheg wrote:Pounce is working as it should. OF course, you know better than Aza, why don't you tell him to fix it now, cause you demand it, huh?Vdova wrote: Pounce now is broken as I sayd.

Did I write something like "I demand"?. Maybe if marauders will get the same, order will start to complain too insted of defending broken mechanic.
I would give pounce 2-3s snare, but for love of god, stop this pouncing everywhere madnes.
Vdova - Witch elf princess of suffer and despair
Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
Whether or not Pounce is fine in the later game is a different question to whether or not it's fine in T2. I don't have an issue with adding a temporary cooldown to Pounce.
Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
Better and better 

Zargas - Sham-L32-RR40
Zarrgas - DK-L32-RR40
Zargass - lMara-L24-RR24
Zarrgas - DK-L32-RR40
Zargass - lMara-L24-RR24
Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
i suggest delete order totally, only then dessies will be happy.
Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
before that would it possible to just change how vertically wls can jump in pounce to stop them from getting on keep walls?Azarael wrote:Whether or not Pounce is fine in the later game is a different question to whether or not it's fine in T2. I don't have an issue with adding a temporary cooldown to Pounce.
like some have pointed out it wasnt possible on live

Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
i suggest come played destru for 3 or 4 week and look the problème 2 or 3 skil of 2 or 3 charac (ok pounce is not areal big prob but 1 arrow @3.55-4k dmg and 1 fire ball @3k with 1k tic dot)...sorry but my cham is 3k2hp 300tough 450resi is normal to be OS? Which class sends of 4k or 3k moment in destro?Soulcheg wrote:i suggest delete order totally, only then dessies will be happy.
very sorry for my bad english...

Zargas - Sham-L32-RR40
Zarrgas - DK-L32-RR40
Zargass - lMara-L24-RR24
Zarrgas - DK-L32-RR40
Zargass - lMara-L24-RR24
Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
Wait for level 40 Mara's pull. If WLs can pounce to keep walls, then Maras should be allowed to pull people from keep walls.Vdova wrote:Pounce doesnt work as on live. On live nobody were able to jump on the keep walls, trust me I have tried it on my WL many timesSoulcheg wrote:Pounce is working as it should. OF course, you know better than Aza, why don't you tell him to fix it now, cause you demand it, huh?Vdova wrote: Pounce now is broken as I sayd.. Why do You think? Because of balance. Because it gives advantage to one realm over other.
Did I write something like "I demand"?. Maybe if marauders will get the same, order will start to complain too insted of defending broken mechanic.
I would give pounce 2-3s snare, but for love of god, stop this pouncing everywhere madnes.
Balanced.
And yeah i play destro and i don't care about Pounce. Unless you give it to Magus.
Ads
Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
The reasons I haven't done this:Coryphaus wrote:before that would it possible to just change how vertically wls can jump in pounce to stop them from getting on keep walls?Azarael wrote:Whether or not Pounce is fine in the later game is a different question to whether or not it's fine in T2. I don't have an issue with adding a temporary cooldown to Pounce.
like some have pointed out it wasnt possible on live
1) The effectiveness of pounce-to-wall is vastly exaggerated. You're out of guard range and out of LOS to players beneath you. If tens of players on a keep wall are seriously threatened by this strategy then they're all asleep.
2) The client gives no indication whatsoever that Pounce should be blocked if the target is too high up. I'm confused as to why this is, because the client seems more than capable of greying out positionals if you don't have valid position.
Re: WL [pounce] 5sec kd or 0 damage
Pounce is not a big deal in group play, unless your tanks are bad and fall for the WL's tricks every single time. I usually see WLs running away from enemy healers. The tanks and mdps chase the WL, and then the WL pounces back to the healers who now happen to be out of guard range. Hint: If you see a WL running AWAY from your backline, don't chase him. Focus on some other enemy that is threatening your backline. Make the WL come to YOU.zarg64 wrote:i suggest come played destru for 3 or 4 week and look the problème 2 or 3 skil of 2 or 3 charac (ok pounce is not areal big prob but 1 arrow @3.55-4k dmg and 1 fire ball @3k with 1k tic dot)...sorry but my cham is 3k2hp 300tough 450resi is normal to be OS? Which class sends of 4k or 3k moment in destro?Soulcheg wrote:i suggest delete order totally, only then dessies will be happy.
very sorry for my bad english...
I also see many tanks punting WLs, just to see them pounce back in mid-air. Hint: KD the WL before you punt him. Can't pounce while being KD. Works even better if you are a BG and KD him for 5 secs.
Many things can be considered OP or broken in this game, but i believe most of them can be countered in at least one way. People should try to find out those counters before coming here asking for nerfs.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ToMaHoTeP and 2 guests