So what the current state of this two beasts are ?
I played dps wp and its kind of slow for me, witch elfes just always breaking my dumn Divine Assault with lose line of sight, Sacrifice stab slowing me and ignore armor on top of it, double invis and they just anihhilating me so easy, i cant do shiet..
I didn't play doc, is this same situation with wh they have or its different playstyle then dps wp ?
Dps wp compare to dps doc
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
Optional: Start your topic title with your class in brackets (e.g., [Shaman]). It helps others find your post faster.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
Optional: Start your topic title with your class in brackets (e.g., [Shaman]). It helps others find your post faster.
Ads
- wildwindblows
- Posts: 586
Re: Dps wp compare to dps doc
both are pretty OP atm. DPS WP have better m1.
They dont have kd or charge but they have the best dps tools atm. They needs to toned down a bit imo.
They dont have kd or charge but they have the best dps tools atm. They needs to toned down a bit imo.
Re: Dps wp compare to dps doc
I take it your asking from a solo perspective?
Regardless DOK has more DMG then WP aswell as better gap closing potential with the snare proccs, wp has slightly better defensive tools in sigmars shield and m1.
Both struggle against range DPS but thanks to snareprocc DOK is better here.
Against melees DOK does better thanks to better sticking potential, though both are good.
All in all dps DOK is slightly better then WP.
Regardless DOK has more DMG then WP aswell as better gap closing potential with the snare proccs, wp has slightly better defensive tools in sigmars shield and m1.
Both struggle against range DPS but thanks to snareprocc DOK is better here.
Against melees DOK does better thanks to better sticking potential, though both are good.
All in all dps DOK is slightly better then WP.
Re: Dps wp compare to dps doc
Cant agree that dok is better. It dont have good m1, his damage lower than usual dps classes, and his tool to work with hard armored targets are nonexistant. Also drowning in blood is often punish you really hard while u dont get really big boost from it. I like design but statwise dok as pure dps is bad. Pressure that wp can create with his insane 3k autos and staked guilty bullshit soul is far better. Dok is safe choise for 6man if you need extra saves heal debuff and armor debuff but in long run 1 real dps is better. That lack of tools to work with armor when order have ton of stakers kiling me., he deal pure phys damage while wp have spirit and penetration options on topof hard nuking autos. I still dont understand why peolle say dok is strong. If you hit squishily noobs with no armor with series of soulcleaves yes it looks strong, but when it comes to figth hard defended target i feel near useless in terms of dps. Also hes kinda ap hungry.
Only toxic part of him is tactic that make your spamable drain undefendable, that makes duels with any nonriposte dps into autowin. But if target have high armor and parry, you are screwed. Spec need sligth balance change from my pov but it would be miracle.
Only toxic part of him is tactic that make your spamable drain undefendable, that makes duels with any nonriposte dps into autowin. But if target have high armor and parry, you are screwed. Spec need sligth balance change from my pov but it would be miracle.
Noximilien - AM, Severi - SM, Ravandin - SW, Celebor - WL, Ernwald - WH, Demandred - BG, Mesana - Sork, Beliar - DoK.
- wildwindblows
- Posts: 586
Re: Dps wp compare to dps doc
DPS wp is really in good state atm. There are sometimes 4-5 dps wp in one sc so this also shows that ppl have enjoy with it.Sever1n wrote: Tue Apr 28, 2026 12:39 pm Cant agree that dok is better. It dont have good m1, his damage lower than usual dps classes, and his tool to work with hard armored targets are nonexistant. Also drowning in blood is often punish you really hard while u dont get really big boost from it. I like design but statwise dok as pure dps is bad. Pressure that wp can create with his insane 3k autos and staked guilty bullshit soul is far better. Dok is safe choise for 6man if you need extra saves heal debuff and armor debuff but in long run 1 real dps is better. That lack of tools to work with armor when order have ton of stakers kiling me., he deal pure phys damage while wp have spirit and penetration options on topof hard nuking autos. I still dont understand why peolle say dok is strong. If you hit squishily noobs with no armor with series of soulcleaves yes it looks strong, but when it comes to figth hard defended target i feel near useless in terms of dps. Also hes kinda ap hungry.
Only toxic part of him is tactic that make your spamable drain undefendable, that makes duels with any nonriposte dps into autowin. But if target have high armor and parry, you are screwed. Spec need sligth balance change from my pov but it would be miracle.
As you see it is not even mentioned in the recent dps patch so a class got what it deserve at least.
- TrainInVain
- Posts: 179
Re: Dps wp compare to dps doc
I have dok/wp a little past 80. I don't favor one over the other. You don't have to limit yourself to just 2h, you can eventually have bis for all three paths.
I find shield priest is the only way I can deal with a WE, and even then all I can do is survive just long enough for them to get bored. Some though, just wreck me no matter what class I play.
I find shield priest is the only way I can deal with a WE, and even then all I can do is survive just long enough for them to get bored. Some though, just wreck me no matter what class I play.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests



