X-Realm Lockout - Potential Solution

[Delerium69]

Why would you not want to reward a group/WB for making things "more even"?

Because that can be gamed and the proposal is only a temporary restriction on renown, XP, crests and bags until their 'timer' runs out. It allows them to play the game which, quite frankly, is what we are all here for!

[djzidu]

Is it possible to let People with lock buff turn to Chicken in RVR?

[Delerium69]

I guess some amendments that could be made to the delivered solution is:

• Check if the player has the debuff already, if so, do not refresh it

• If the AAO of the side they enter the lake on is > 0% then do not apply debuff

With the 2nd point it really promotes people to swap sides and not get the penalty when it balances the lake better.

Del

[Wholdar]

• If the AAO of the side they enter the lake on is > 0% then do not apply debuff

Also - if tier is tier1, dont apply debuff.

/j

[krumhur]

Why would you not want to reward a group/WB for making things "more even"?

Because that can be gamed and the proposal is only a temporary restriction on renown, XP, crests and bags until their 'timer' runs out. It allows them to play the game which, quite frankly, is what we are all here for!

I'm relatively new to the server, and haven't followed the devs stances on different topics across the ages but, from this reply (viewtopic.php?t=44442&start=20#p581941), it seems that up to august 2025 having multiple accounts was more or less tolerated. Even circumventing the lockout was not really punished or prosecuted ("If someone really wants to get around our very minor lockout timer and implementation, they can, but they'll know we would rather they didn't and have to live with that mild guilt of disapproval for several minutes").

Has the devs stance changed with the new lockout system? It would be appropriate to have a clear reply to this I guess.

[Delerium69]

Why would you not want to reward a group/WB for making things "more even"?

Because that can be gamed and the proposal is only a temporary restriction on renown, XP, crests and bags until their 'timer' runs out. It allows them to play the game which, quite frankly, is what we are all here for!

I'm relatively new to the server, and haven't followed the devs stances on different topics across the ages but, from this reply (viewtopic.php?t=44442&start=20#p581941), it seems that up to august 2025 having multiple accounts was more or less tolerated. Even circumventing the lockout was not really punished or prosecuted ("If someone really wants to get around our very minor lockout timer and implementation, they can, but they'll know we would rather they didn't and have to live with that mild guilt of disapproval for several minutes").

Has the devs stance changed with the new lockout system? It would be appropriate to have a clear reply to this I guess.

as far as i know people used a vpn to circumvent it but i dont beleive that method works anymore.