Can we stop voting surrender in winning scenarios?

[Nevermore2000]

Seriously, surrender votes in scenarios get out of hand. Not only do people bring up the vote after the first lost fight, no they also want to surrender nowadays in a WINNING match! Because we don't kill enough for the scenario quests! I mean wtf actually? Last match we were leading by 200 points and ultimately won, too. But one guy started a surrender vote with the words that people obviously only play for the win, not for the kills. Luckily team voted against it.

Why is surrender voting even allowed if you are on the winning team??? It should finally be changed to only be allowed once you are like 200 points behind. I am sick that you are in a match for 1 minute and the surrender vote already pops up!

[illumius]

If people vote for a surrend on a "winning" scenario, it means they know more about this game than you do.

[Nameless]

Imo being 200 points ahead and 0vs40 by kills doesnt measure as winning and i would insta hit surrender at 11 mins mark. You are just herd to gain some points advantage so keep trowing bodies into the meat grinder since winning by point doesnt means anything while enemy premade took loads of easy crests and renown.
So yea keep winning

[Nevermore2000]

You obviously don't read. We won! The guy just wanted to surrender because he was hunting kills for the event quest and even would have thrown matches for that. I know exactly the reason why. It is just terrible sportsmanship and I wonder why people play games if they don't actually want to play!

[Hecksa]

Imo being 200 points ahead and 0vs40 by kills doesnt measure as winning and i would insta hit surrender at 11 mins mark.

As someone who much prefers getting kills to winning a scenario, even I must admit...there are some areas where you get to have opinions as to what winning means, and others where...I mean...it literally says at the end of the match who won - the side with the most points.

You and I might not like that the objective of the game isn't to be able to fight better than the other team, but that doesn't change reality. The game very clearly says who won.

More on topic, I'm mostly opposed to the surrender mechanic in general, but I'm definitely opposed to surrending while ahead. Particularly at the weekend, when there are people trying to complete live event tasks, some of whom really struggle to get their wins in the amount of time they can play for the weekend, and others are going to deliberately throw away a winning scenario?

[sonorous]

starting /surrender vote for this thread. Please respond with your vote as Yes or No reply

In all seriousness. You have no idea the absolute horror of being kept hostage for 15 minutes 3 scens in a row so a premade group could farm the WC

[Hecksa]

You have no idea the absolute horror of being kept hostage for 15 minutes 3 scens in a row so a premade group could farm the WC

I'm fairly certain the vast, vast majority of players have experienced this at some point. Including most premade players. I've definitely experienced that situation from both perspectives so, so many times over the years.

But it's not really relevant right now anyway. This is about surrendering while winning, so you're clearly not being helpessly spawncamped, because clearly people are at least able to get out long enough to complete some form of objective.

[Florian90210]

People come to SCs for fair fights, not be clowns in someone else circus. It's not a win if premade was too busy farming your team and let it slide for your "win" by points.

[bichka]

If people vote for a surrend on a "winning" scenario, it means they know more about this game than you do.

pretty much this
Some "winning" scs are just farm place for opposite side. Thats why ppl voting for surrender

[Sulorie]

The premade actually wants you to have more points so they can farm you even longer since many people won't surrender.