Which part of it exactly is an exploit? Explain in detail
Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?

Ads
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Tell me if you really believes nothing wrong here
- Attachments
-
- Безымянный.png (442.82 KiB) Viewed 766 times
Jawaaghye [ Goblin Division ] - SH 80+
-
- Posts: 7
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
When you know something is not working as intended and yet you continue to abuse it, it's exploiting.
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
How is it not working as intended? It's been this way for over a yearmarquisxxx wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 pm When you know something is not working as intended and yet you continue to abuse it, it's exploiting.
It's funny, LNM were on Destro tonight and none of them are complaining on here - because they actually just figured out how to counter it and murdered our cheesy RP wb all night instead of just complaining about how it's an "exploit"
Last edited by Minisynn on Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
game's exploit could exist for a very long time, but it does not means people can/must use itMinisynn wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:33 pmHow is it not working as intended? It's been this way for over a yearmarquisxxx wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 pm When you know something is not working as intended and yet you continue to abuse it, it's exploiting.
Jawaaghye [ Goblin Division ] - SH 80+
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
what part of it is not intended?
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
So basically, it's an exploit because you don't like it? Because you're really giving absolutely zero argument here for what's actually exploiting about using game mechanics in their intended way, but just stacking a shitload of one class to do it lolNeznan wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:35 pmgame's exploit could exist for a very long time, but it does not means people can/must use itMinisynn wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:33 pmHow is it not working as intended? It's been this way for over a yearmarquisxxx wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:31 pm When you know something is not working as intended and yet you continue to abuse it, it's exploiting.
Obviously it's super cheesy but it's literally countered by just charging at the RPs and flattening them because they have no guards and practically zero ability to kite

- khorne8kill
- Posts: 11
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
my personal opinion should be that ROB should not be stackable or you will just have every RP using it in a choke point on one tank and wiping full WBs
Ads
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
Everything is disrespectful and wastes my time. I have over 9,000 health and I die in 2 seconds. It's unacceptable. I don't like opportunists.
Re: Rune of Battle is the new ID - who needs Slayers?
gentlmen above say that nothing wrong her, working as intended.
Jawaaghye [ Goblin Division ] - SH 80+
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests