baddy need rely on pet more comicaljonathanmurphy3 wrote:A chosen talking about 'fair' is most comical indeed.Bullen1995 wrote:Yes and where is the argument? how in the hell is that fair?Jayzboi wrote:Yes white lions are stronger than on live server. But that is fair enough to be honest.
WLs are the new SHs
Re: WLs are the new SHs
Ads
Re: WLs are the new SHs
Ok, thanks for your clarifications and imput. I had the impression that WL pet was right now than it was in T1 and your replies confirm it's true. As Azarael points out, I was wrong concerning the pet health pool and maybe the explanation of my perception of improved damage compared to live lies in the AA. I have the impression that AA is faster and more powerful now. I used to play a WL one month ago for a while and when I checked enemy's dps chart I noticed that the pet's autoattack was the main source of my damage output by far, don't remember the exact % but it was conspicuous. The special abilities of the pet seem to be the same as in the past.
Re: WLs are the new SHs
Edit: I meant "enemy" addon not "enemy" as in my foe or adversary.
- TenTonHammer
- Posts: 3807
Re: WLs are the new SHs
jonathanmurphy3 wrote:A chosen talking about 'fair' is most comical indeed.Bullen1995 wrote:Yes and where is the argument? how in the hell is that fair?Jayzboi wrote:Yes white lions are stronger than on live server. But that is fair enough to be honest.
To be fair chosens are one of the most balanced classes and tanks in the game, a class that for all of mythics blatant incompetence acctully got something right, yet they did a complete about face and threw that balance out the window when they designed KOBS
Re: WLs are the new SHs
whoa so someone actually agree with meTenTonHammer wrote: To be fair chosens are one of the most balanced classes and tanks in the game, a class that for all of mythics blatant incompetence acctully got something right, yet they did a complete about face and threw that balance out the window when they designed KOBS
Btw the problem is the same, wrong scaling and interation of pet with player. The fact that wl can actually run away and leave the wl kill you is not fair .....even if it's t1,just like it's not fair have a weak wl in t4 . Both issue need attention in future.
- jonathanmurphy3
- Posts: 266
Re: WLs are the new SHs
So you want to balance the White Lion for T1 combat? Is that what you're saying? Because that's hysterical, if that's the case.
The pets were ALWAYS powerful in T1. Fact. T1 doesn't hold a candle to the importance/resources that ought to be devoted to T4. T4 IS the game for most people.
@Zoombi: perhaps this is new to you, but the White Lion is a pet class, and as such correct usage of said pet is not only beneficial, but encouraged! #thingsyoulearn
The pets were ALWAYS powerful in T1. Fact. T1 doesn't hold a candle to the importance/resources that ought to be devoted to T4. T4 IS the game for most people.
@Zoombi: perhaps this is new to you, but the White Lion is a pet class, and as such correct usage of said pet is not only beneficial, but encouraged! #thingsyoulearn
Spoiler:
Re: WLs are the new SHs
I couldn't have said this any better.Tesq wrote:
The fact that wl can actually run away and leave the wl kill you is not fair .....even if it's t1,just like it's not fair have a weak wl in t4 .
- Kaitanaroyr
- Posts: 484
- Contact:
Re: WLs are the new SHs
yet you'll never see the pet in t4 except for fetch bc its useless pet was always strong in t1 kiting with the pet was common its isn't unfair it maybe a cheap kill but it was how it workedTesq wrote:whoa so someone actually agree with meTenTonHammer wrote: To be fair chosens are one of the most balanced classes and tanks in the game, a class that for all of mythics blatant incompetence acctully got something right, yet they did a complete about face and threw that balance out the window when they designed KOBS
Btw the problem is the same, wrong scaling and interation of pet with player. The fact that wl can actually run away and leave the wl kill you is not fair .....even if it's t1,just like it's not fair have a weak wl in t4 . Both issue need attention in future.
Spoiler:
Ads
Re: WLs are the new SHs
To be fair if people criticize the cheap use of WL pet they should also criticize the cheap use of SH pet.
I see a flaw behind Jonathanmurphy's reasoning: "WL is a pet class so I don't understand why using the pet is criticised" Obviously the pet must be used. The question is: Do you use the pet as a helper, a comrade in arms, do you actually fight ALONGSIDE your trusty friend, be it as a melee if you are a WL or as a ranged fighter if you are a SH? Or do you send your pet to fight the battle where YOU should be the main actor, the protagonist, and meanwhile you stay at a safe distance (that means outside melee range for WL and further away than 100 ft for SH)?
I can't really criticize that cheap use of the pet, but I surely despise it and look at it with disappointment and sadness. Everyone can do as they like, I will never rage or whine or get mad at it. It's a lawful choice. It's not hacking nor cheating of any kind. It is only sad imho.
In t1 it had always been easy for a SH to send their pet against a lowbie clothie without self heals and get super easy kills while you stand outside your warcamp watching the whole scene with your binoculars and chat to your mates.
To see WL pets chasing lonely level 4 BWs across a scenario and the owner never in sight is disheartening.
When I played WL I felt that the heart and soul of the class was to fight ALONGSIDE your lion. there is even a skill called COORDINATED STRIKE.
I see a flaw behind Jonathanmurphy's reasoning: "WL is a pet class so I don't understand why using the pet is criticised" Obviously the pet must be used. The question is: Do you use the pet as a helper, a comrade in arms, do you actually fight ALONGSIDE your trusty friend, be it as a melee if you are a WL or as a ranged fighter if you are a SH? Or do you send your pet to fight the battle where YOU should be the main actor, the protagonist, and meanwhile you stay at a safe distance (that means outside melee range for WL and further away than 100 ft for SH)?
I can't really criticize that cheap use of the pet, but I surely despise it and look at it with disappointment and sadness. Everyone can do as they like, I will never rage or whine or get mad at it. It's a lawful choice. It's not hacking nor cheating of any kind. It is only sad imho.
In t1 it had always been easy for a SH to send their pet against a lowbie clothie without self heals and get super easy kills while you stand outside your warcamp watching the whole scene with your binoculars and chat to your mates.
To see WL pets chasing lonely level 4 BWs across a scenario and the owner never in sight is disheartening.
When I played WL I felt that the heart and soul of the class was to fight ALONGSIDE your lion. there is even a skill called COORDINATED STRIKE.
Re: WLs are the new SHs
WL is just another example of the poor scaling that mythic did with their classes, its power peaks too early before the effectiveness of the class starts to fall off just like blorcs and some other classes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 39 guests