Hello.
I would like to suggest something that could be healthy for ROR.
Current end-game is City Sieges, but not every class is good/desirable for that kind of content since its own nature. This fact makes hard for a good amount of people to play with some kind of coordination or colaboration, making "to lose" becomes a "rule" at the end.
If you win, you deserve more reward, its a fact, i totally agree, and if you lose, you deserve a lesser reward.
Current gap in rewards between winning and losing is not helping in terms of longevity for RoR, that why i suggest that the amount of City's stars should affect the amount of Royal Crests whether you win or lose.
Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
Structured class balance suggestions belong in the Balance Proposal subforum. Class-related discussion in this section are considered as ongoing debates and ARE NOT reviewed for balance changes.
Ads
Re: Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
Or, and I know this might be a shocking concept to some, just balance the classes.
- Greywolfamakir
- Posts: 42
- Contact:
Re: Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
I assume that Devs don't want to make bad AoE classes like WH, WE, SW...as good as classes like BW, Choppa, MSH, SL...etc. They'll have good reasons for that.
Since this assumption looks more like a fact, we have to think how to help disadvantaged people.
Re: Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
What gap are you talking about? If you are lucky with rolls as a loser you will get equal/more royals than a bagless winner. The typical 1-2 royals difference between winning and losing a stage (before bags) is hardly a large gap, the opposite actually.
Nekkma / Hjortron
Zatakk
Smultron
Zatakk
Smultron
Re: Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
It's funny you mention that, because MSH was'nt good pre-rework. I think rSW will be reworked soon.Greywolfamakir wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 11:43 amI assume that Devs don't want to make bad AoE classes like WH, WE, SW...as good as classes like BW, Choppa, MSH, SL...etc. They'll have good reasons for that.
Since this assumption looks more like a fact, we have to think how to help disadvantaged people.
Re: Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
If anything the system is too generous to losers but it needs to be otherwise ppl wouldn't even try if they were pugs which is 80% of order rn.
Re: Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
But they want free stuff for being afk
- Greywolfamakir
- Posts: 42
- Contact:
Re: Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
I dont like that "If you are lucky with rolls".
I dont take "luck" in consideration.
I didn't say something about AFK players, Im talking about current end-game is City Sieges, and the only real way to get best gear, but certain classes are rejected in WB, and you get forced to pug at the end because no one invites you.
Ads
Re: Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
Players afk when they start to lose , cities, keeps, sc ... this is a fact and by increasing the reward you encourage players to enter with no hope of victory. This is clear when you look as some of the pug warbands where they have 1 healer and 1 tank. They are there to get the loser reward and have no ambition to win.Greywolfamakir wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 12:07 pmI dont like that "If you are lucky with rolls".
I dont take "luck" in consideration.
I didn't say something about AFK players, Im talking about current end-game is City Sieges, and the only real way to get best gear, but certain classes are rejected in WB, and you get forced to pug at the end because no one invites you.
A lot of the warbands going city should not even be able to queue , this is where the problem is
Re: Reduce the gap in rewards between winning and losing
Well, you need to take in the total amount of royals awarded to each side and then you leave luck out of it.Greywolfamakir wrote: ↑Mon May 18, 2020 12:07 pm
I dont like that "If you are lucky with rolls".
I dont take "luck" in consideration.
So you propose to remove/reduce bags for losers? Otherwise your proposal makes no sense as you state: "If you win, you deserve more reward, its a fact, i totally agree, and if you lose, you deserve a lesser reward." Or is you suggestion that losers get one less royal than winners and keep all bagrolls? Is that really a whorty reward for winning?
Nekkma / Hjortron
Zatakk
Smultron
Zatakk
Smultron
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests