Tank Offensive Sovereign Feedback

[wargrimnir]

Tanks have toughness. It's a core stat for the archtype. Even the "DPS" spec. Some of this might be traded for more weaponskill instead on the DPS set.

Swordmaster last I checked uses physical damage on all of their autoattacks and ~10 other abilities, weaponskill is not "useless" for them.

[Babanim]

Tanks have toughness. It's a core stat for the archtype. Even the "DPS" spec.

That was not taken into consideration when Bloodlord was created.

Bloodlord only has 21 toughness for the entire set. 21 toughness on one piece, that's it.

It's the best set for 2h tanks, almost perfectly designed.

This is exactly what the great majority wants from offensive sov.

Please do not deviate from what was established by the Bloodlord set (e.g. take a high toughness/hybrid direction).

Thanks!

[Akilinus]

There is a reason why the majority of 2h tanks are using: dominator, oppressor and bloodlord.

The only reason given to have so much toughness on the offensive set is that "real tanks" use these defensive stats.

[wargrimnir]

So go use Bloodlord?

[Akilinus]

It was said that City sieges would have the best gear

[wargrimnir]

It was said that City sieges would have the best gear

Objectively best gear. Most stats, most armor, unique GIAB.
Subjectively best gear is whatever you like the most man.

[Akilinus]

It was said that City sieges would have the best gear

Objectively best gear. Most stats, most armor, unique GIAB.
Subjectively best gear is whatever you like the most man.

with 3 different sets its almost like you tried to make 1 for each playstyle + a hybrid.
Why change the stat build from previous sets when a big part of the community liked them the way they were?

[wargrimnir]

It was said that City sieges would have the best gear

Objectively best gear. Most stats, most armor, unique GIAB.
Subjectively best gear is whatever you like the most man.

with 3 different sets its almost like you tried to make 1 for each playstyle + a hybrid.
Why change the stat build from previous sets when a big part of the community liked them the way they were?

My apologies dear Lorax. I did not realize you speak for the community.

We take feedback when it's well presented, and if you guys are going off on tangents someone might poke their head in to guide you along.
I'm not really gonna argue much with you guys, you know what you want. I hope you'll settle with something that we have.

[Akilinus]

Objectively best gear. Most stats, most armor, unique GIAB.
Subjectively best gear is whatever you like the most man.

with 3 different sets its almost like you tried to make 1 for each playstyle + a hybrid.
Why change the stat build from previous sets when a big part of the community liked them the way they were?

My apologies dear Lorax. I did not realize you speak for the community.

We take feedback when it's well presented, and if you guys are going off on tangents someone might poke their head in to guide you along.
I'm not really gonna argue much with you guys, you know what you want. I hope you'll settle with something that we have.

Did not claim that I speak for the whole community but it seems like many of the players that would be intrested in the offensive set agrees that there should be some changes to the stats.

[WARChosen]

if i can ask if it's an offensive set then why there is no mele crit chance, mele power or haste on each piece of armor i don't talk of set bonuses