Or maybe if people didn’t have to run to a random portal, there wouldn’t be anything for gankers to do and they might actually have to join the defense and be useful?Panodil wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:04 pm Or maybe just let people die who cant defend them self in the wild![]()
Portal in kv to Stonewatch
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
- CountTalabecland
- Posts: 1026
Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
Brynnoth Goldenbeard (40/80) (IB) -- Rundin Fireheart (40/50) (RP) -- Ungrinn (40/40) (Engi)-- Bramm Bloodaxe (40/83) (Slayer) and a few Empire characters here or there, maybe even an elf.
Ads
- TenTonHammer
- Posts: 3806
Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
devs could just put the portal for the winning faction in their war campManatikik wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 6:47 pm
At this point it’s ‘possible’ but an incredibly difficult and time consuming task to rearrange a whole map. Its probably not even on their list of goals at the moment.

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
But ganking people who really want to afk in fort is so rewarding 

Panodil WP
Panodill DoK
Panodilz Zealot
Panodilr Runepriest
Run Shaman
Panage Archmage
Panodill DoK
Panodilz Zealot
Panodilr Runepriest
Run Shaman
Panage Archmage
- CountTalabecland
- Posts: 1026
Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
Fair enough, how about if someone gets the afk tag in a fort they are teleported to where the portal is now? Then you and the group can 6v1 beat them with a prison sock filled with locks or whatever you want?Panodil wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:05 pm But ganking people who really want to afk in fort is so rewarding![]()
Brynnoth Goldenbeard (40/80) (IB) -- Rundin Fireheart (40/50) (RP) -- Ungrinn (40/40) (Engi)-- Bramm Bloodaxe (40/83) (Slayer) and a few Empire characters here or there, maybe even an elf.
- Anjanolian
- Posts: 124
Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
....When you wanna use portal and get message like that "in combat you cant"...if you are not in zergy or party/wb....totally f...Panodil wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:04 pm Or maybe just let people die who cant defend them self in the wild![]()
Its not about defending self or not....
...Bride of Khaine...
Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
We dont gank 6v1, we strong so we gank 24v1.CountTalabecland wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:08 pmFair enough, how about if someone gets the afk tag in a fort they are teleported to where the portal is now? Then you and the group can 6v1 beat them with a prison sock filled with locks or whatever you want?Panodil wrote: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:05 pm But ganking people who really want to afk in fort is so rewarding![]()
Panodil WP
Panodill DoK
Panodilz Zealot
Panodilr Runepriest
Run Shaman
Panage Archmage
Panodill DoK
Panodilz Zealot
Panodilr Runepriest
Run Shaman
Panage Archmage
- gargharoth
- Posts: 98
Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
I have a better idea, maybe you can put these portals in the enemy warcamp?The only issue with that is engis pulling people through energy wall.
Order has the almost same portals, for example, at Black Crag.

Kupaczabra
Roadblock
Roadblock
- Jandeporas
- Posts: 39
Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
Put fort attackers portal in cities.
"That's just the way it is" is the shittiest excuse you can scrap from the bottom of the barrel.
"That's just the way it is" is the shittiest excuse you can scrap from the bottom of the barrel.
Spoiler:
Ads
Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
Suggestions:
- After zonelock create/keep the spawnpoints in keeps, this reduces the reinforcement disparity (especially in zones like KV and BC).
- also remove the "out of combat" requirement to use these portals to counter longrangecheese thats only targeted to keep people in combat. It also wouldn't force players to selfsacrifice themselves out of fortspot because they fought the enemy off or threw a heal.
- After zonelock create/keep the spawnpoints in keeps, this reduces the reinforcement disparity (especially in zones like KV and BC).
- also remove the "out of combat" requirement to use these portals to counter longrangecheese thats only targeted to keep people in combat. It also wouldn't force players to selfsacrifice themselves out of fortspot because they fought the enemy off or threw a heal.

Re: Portal in kv to Stonewatch
Both sides suffer from camping and it's garbage.
The "attack and go to portal in zone, defend and portal in city" confuses new players. A lot. I know I lost my second fort spot because I thought I had to go to altdorf (my first was a defense). And I regularly answer the question of where to go. Making the portal locations somehow consistent would be... helpful. If that's in wc or city, whatever. As long as it's consistent.
The "attack and go to portal in zone, defend and portal in city" confuses new players. A lot. I know I lost my second fort spot because I thought I had to go to altdorf (my first was a defense). And I regularly answer the question of where to go. Making the portal locations somehow consistent would be... helpful. If that's in wc or city, whatever. As long as it's consistent.
Wargrimnir - Dear unverified refugees of the skaven ridden dumpster fire we occasionally call "the server"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests