Recent Topics

Ads

[Fortres abuse tactic]

Share your ideas and feedback to help improve the game.
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.

This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.

To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Locked
chokeanutsman
Posts: 77

Re: [Fortres abuse tactic]

Post#11 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 4:56 pm

May as well keep it that way for now because when you win a defense successfully, it goes back to T4 RvR instead of having to go from T2 T3 T4.

No hard incentive to make people want a "crushing victory" really (where it makes you want to win in T2 T3 T4 to Fort)
Top
Ads
User avatar
Martok
Posts: 2110
Contact:
Contact Martok

Re: [Fortres abuse tactic]

Post#12 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:45 pm

I don't see this as abuse either. The third-floor defense isn't a guaranteed win for either side, just a sound strategy.
Welcome to Warhammer, No Fun Allowed!!
Top
User avatar
Ototo
Posts: 1012

Re: [Fortres abuse tactic]

Post#13 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:57 pm

Martok wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 5:45 pm I don't see this as abuse either. The third-floor defense isn't a guaranteed win for either side, just a sound strategy.
This is my point of view too.
Spoiler:
Top
User avatar
DanielWinner
Posts: 727
Contact:
Contact DanielWinner

Re: [Fortres abuse tactic]

Post#14 » Fri Jun 14, 2019 6:52 pm

OP got enough responses.
Ripliel - Shadow Warrior.
Riphael - Black Guard.

Very Serious Warhammer Online Montage
Spoiler:
Gotcha
Image
Top
Locked

Return to “Suggestions & Feedback”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests