Smurf Groups

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
User avatar
Dackle
Posts: 143

Smurf Groups

Post#1 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:01 pm

<removed>
Last edited by Dackle on Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Ads
User avatar
Eathisword
Posts: 808

Re: Smurf Groups

Post#2 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:14 pm

Probably not the case.

For one, it would be incredibly stupid... since a proper group would win by absolute annihilation 19/20 scenario anyway...
Farfadet, RR72 shaman
Volgograd, RR80 IB
Video thread here.

User avatar
Dackle
Posts: 143

Re: Smurf Groups

Post#3 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:19 pm

<removed>
Last edited by Dackle on Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
peterthepan3
Posts: 6509

Re: Smurf Groups

Post#4 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:59 pm

Dackle wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:01 pm

Is the new meta to get in the same communication channel (Discord, ect.) and wipe your alt guild for the R's or paragons?

No.
Image

User avatar
Martok
Posts: 2259
Contact:

Re: Smurf Groups

Post#5 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:05 pm

I found myself in one of those type sc's yesterday, where players who shall remain nameless, players who typically are very aggressive and playing to win, were basically standing around doing nothing or running in solo to get killed. I didn't understand it either.

Regardless of what may or may not be true, Dackle makes one valid point. Some of us have been playing long enough to be able to spot an abnormality.
Somewhere, In Time...

User avatar
Dackle
Posts: 143

Re: Smurf Groups

Post#6 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:58 pm

<removed>
Last edited by Dackle on Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dansari
Posts: 2524

Re: Smurf Groups

Post#7 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:20 pm

Dackle wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:58 pm
peterthepan3 wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:59 pm
Dackle wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:01 pm

Is the new meta to get in the same communication channel (Discord, ect.) and wipe your alt guild for the R's or paragons?

No.
Peter, I am not sure your role, however I have read many of your posts. You seem very sure of yourself on many issues. I am not saying one way or the other, but it may warrant being looked at. Does your definitive NO has some factual basis behind it or is that just your feeling?

No disrespect, your comments are public in the forums.
Peter speaks from a lot of 6v6 experience. I don't have much myself, comparatively, but tend to agree that what you're claiming to see is not what you assume it is.
<Salt Factory>

User avatar
Dackle
Posts: 143

Re: Smurf Groups

Post#8 » Sat May 11, 2019 7:21 pm

dansari wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:20 pm
Dackle wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:58 pm
peterthepan3 wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:59 pm

No.
Peter, I am not sure your role, however I have read many of your posts. You seem very sure of yourself on many issues. I am not saying one way or the other, but it may warrant being looked at. Does your definitive NO has some factual basis behind it or is that just your feeling?

No disrespect, your comments are public in the forums.
Peter speaks from a lot of 6v6 experience. I don't have much myself, comparatively, but tend to agree that what you're claiming to see is not what you assume it is.
Thanks for the clarification.

FYI, this exact scenario was discussed recently whilst lurking in a communication program I was invited to while running a dungeon instance. Randoms, discussing random things... (only the players were not so random)

PS - I like how the body of my messages were removed, but the replies still tell the story. More so, the story is transparent.

Ads

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 20 guests