dansari wrote:DPS WP is definitely one of the lowliest classes in the game at the moment. I think the parry strikethrough was delivered as a bandaid test: can DPS WP succeed if given a 10% parry strikethrough on the level a DPS DOK can currently succeed (and please don't argue that DPS DOK is no better than DPS WP...)? If the answer turns out to be no, then other things will need to be looked at for the class... but I really can't see the point of arguing that either 1) 2h WP didn't need the strikethrough and it's had some miraculous impact in making the class OP, or 2) that giving 2h tanks a 10% parry strikethrough would have been a good idea (BOs, SMs, and Knights specifically would have seen a boost and I don't think any of those classes need buffing).
In all honesty though... 2h tanks dont need strikethrough, they need better access to guard damage mitigation. The only value strikethrough brings is when punting other tanks... So "block" strikethrough works fine for that.
I would MUCH prefer 2H provide 10% parry over 10% "strikethrough" anything... But I tried to carry this flag for a while and not many people supported it (eventhough there is some historical RL background for this).
However rather than argue what 2H should or shouldnt provide... I would rather just see tanks given a CHOICE. Let all tanks choose to DW or 2H and let people choose. Do you want 10% parry (for guard mitigation) OR do you want 10% strikethrough (block) for punting. Your choice.
I see no reason, other than lore and maybe some work on the DEV side, to not allow this. Frankly, I cant think of anything that gets me more excited than the thought of using DW on one of my tanks... It would be freaking AWESOME. You wouldnt need to do ANY other work, other than let tanks use DW.... No quests need updating, etc etc. All the "rules" are already in play. We already get 1Hers... It just seems like a "no brainer" option IF POSSIBLE... The only question I wonder is on animations...