[Declined] Proposal for changes SW (Assault)

[lastalien]

Proposal for changes SW (was decline 8/11/16 bc expecting .ab ex)

For discussion

In the current environment, the game has 2 trees that are either not used or used very rarely is a path of Scout and Assault.
In general, the SW is now used only as a machine for getting an additional chance to crit or gang spec range knockdown with heal debaff and AoE Lilith, ie mainly as a Skirmisher.
In fact, there is no variation in the use of class.

I have a proposal for improving the Assault path.

Path of Assault.
1. Sweeping Slash - remove the cd to be able to assist slayer in the RVR and transferred to a branch instead of Exploit Weakness (13 pt). Exploit Weakness put in place Sweeping Slash (9 pt). Mb dont switch.
2. Draw Blood do with AoE effects by 40 feet in front of SW (bind to assault stance)
3. Counterstrike same, do with AoE effects by 40 feet in front of SW
4. Hunter’s Fervor - add 5 seconds to the time of action (20 sec) and + 5% AP recovery value (25% total)

Reasoning
These changes allow the use of SW as a AoE meleDD and would make a variation of the game for SW
Changes is primarily directed to the RVR and scenes where the SW can be revealed as a second DD with the slayer.
None of them is an OP, but together they will give an acceptable level of damage to a full-fledged DD.

[Gerv]

Hi Lastalien

This proposal in its current form is too extensive for a comprehensive and in-depth discussion to occur around, edit your proposal and then i will re-consider it.
For example, decide on one path, the more important to discuss and provide reasoning as to why and how these specific changes to abilities will achieve the overall aim of the proposal.

- Gerv

[lastalien]

Spoiler:

Hi Lastalien

This proposal in its current form is too extensive for a comprehensive and in-depth discussion to occur around, edit your proposal and then i will re-consider it.
For example, decide on one path, the more important to discuss and provide reasoning as to why and how these specific changes to abilities will achieve the overall aim of the proposal.

- Gerv

Did I understand correctly that you are proposing to achieve the goal with a large number of proposals, but with minor changes?

[Gerv]

Hi Lastalien

This proposal is going to be declined. While you did make the proposal shorter you do not identify the underlying issues
- Why the assault stance of a Shadow Warrior is not currently used in groups for example - low ability damage or lack of viable group utility.
- Why the tree needs to be moved from a singe target focused build to an AoE build and How your suggested changes will assist the assault stance Shadow Warrior compete with the WL and WH for a place with a slayer in groups.

Gerv