The names should be published for the same reason we have Bans and Ban Appeals subforums. The team chose to be more transparent on bans and I think you should stick to it even in cases like this.Elven wrote:For those stating the punishment being soft and only quoting part of the punishment, I would advice you check the official post which covers what punishments were given to those who exploited the said bug, here:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16439
As for the names, I don't see how that's worth publicly stating. So we won't be publishing that. I will say however that somewhere around 200 characters were confirmed exploiting this bug.
Without official information all we can have is speculation and hackusations. That's not healthy for anyone.