Recent Topics
Ads
is it legit?
Re: is it legit?
maybe 8 times or so, with the BW abilities hitting in the same timestamp, + some procs like BW/WP procs + maybe epic weapon proc. 16 sounds like a quick outing of frustration.
Last edited by Reklaw on Sat Jul 09, 2016 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CRITICAL ACCLAIM
Reklaw R40 SO - Jabberwocky R40 DoK - Googol R40 MAg - Tinteling R40 MAr - Jabster R41 Chp - Unoffensive R23 SH - Jabbywoo R33 Zealot - Kittycat - Donalduck
Ihavecats R40 WL - Jabber R32 - Species R42 BW - Panini R26 AM - Frailty
Reklaw R40 SO - Jabberwocky R40 DoK - Googol R40 MAg - Tinteling R40 MAr - Jabster R41 Chp - Unoffensive R23 SH - Jabbywoo R33 Zealot - Kittycat - Donalduck
Ihavecats R40 WL - Jabber R32 - Species R42 BW - Panini R26 AM - Frailty
Ads
Re: is it legit?
Is there such a log with timestamps available, though? Or is this one based on, well... "impressions"?Valfaros wrote:Hmm how about the fancy timestamp the combat log offers if you check mark the option for it.Dabbart wrote:
I am curious how you knew it was 16 casts in a single second though. My combat log doesn't show the hour/min/sec that the ability was logged. So how did you get the 16 in 1?
Re: is it legit?
1 hit from a BW can proc 4 instances of dmg
Ability+FoR+FP+FoR
casting an insta cast after a casted ability or channel can cause damage to hit at the same time (so 8 instances of damage possible) than like stated above a travel time? Not sure on this but that would be 12 hits + any dots.
I forget if things like BB proc FoR/FP if so then ya def can hit 16 times with enough RNG.
Ability+FoR+FP+FoR
casting an insta cast after a casted ability or channel can cause damage to hit at the same time (so 8 instances of damage possible) than like stated above a travel time? Not sure on this but that would be 12 hits + any dots.
I forget if things like BB proc FoR/FP if so then ya def can hit 16 times with enough RNG.
♂ ♂ ♂ <Lords of the Locker Room> ♂ ♂ ♂ <Old School> ♂ ♂ ♂
Re: is it legit?
Valfaros wrote:
Hmm how about the fancy timestamp the combat log offers if you check mark the option for it.
Well 16 abilitys or even procs sounds kinda high so if he gets a proove of that we can take a closer look what actually happend and decide if it is possible but without any screen there is no way to tell what happend.
D'oh! I did know that one too...
Re: is it legit?
I also forget WP damage procs, so actually 1 ability could proc 6 instance of damage?
Ability>FoR(25/75%)>PoR(25%)>FP>FoR(25/75%)>PoR(25%)
Ability>FoR(25/75%)>PoR(25%)>FP>FoR(25/75%)>PoR(25%)
♂ ♂ ♂ <Lords of the Locker Room> ♂ ♂ ♂ <Old School> ♂ ♂ ♂
Re: is it legit?
Not sure all the Abbv's there, but Weapon Procs as well.Jaycub wrote:I also forget WP damage procs, so actually 1 ability could proc 6 instance of damage?
Ability>FoR(25/75%)>PoR(25%)>FP>FoR(25/75%)>PoR(25%)
Re: is it legit?
Flames of Ruin and Prayer of Righteousness, FP stands for funnel power which is considered a seperate hit that can proc anything.
Just tried BB/SB and they don't proc anything it seems.
So you could have SB/BB/Ignite tick/Detonate tick and then a tick of withering heat channel into a nova the same time the withering heat ticks and have.... 16 possible hits within a second :^)
Just tried BB/SB and they don't proc anything it seems.
So you could have SB/BB/Ignite tick/Detonate tick and then a tick of withering heat channel into a nova the same time the withering heat ticks and have.... 16 possible hits within a second :^)
♂ ♂ ♂ <Lords of the Locker Room> ♂ ♂ ♂ <Old School> ♂ ♂ ♂
Re: is it legit?
As long as the OP doesn't care about delivering any evidence, this topic lines up in an impressive history of posts created with lots of assertions, but no evidence/explanation.
Makes no sense to discuss anything that high likely never happened.
@ the combat log discussion: combat logs without timestamps are useless for almost everything; even with timestamps they are not 100% clear (network lag, rounding)
Makes no sense to discuss anything that high likely never happened.
@ the combat log discussion: combat logs without timestamps are useless for almost everything; even with timestamps they are not 100% clear (network lag, rounding)
Ads
Re: is it legit?
As Luth stated clearly, this discussion can end. If the OP does have the evidence to support his claim he can PM it to Luth.
Locked.
Locked.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests



