[WITCH ELF] amelioration
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
Optional: Start your topic title with your class in brackets (e.g., [Shaman]). It helps others find your post faster.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
Optional: Start your topic title with your class in brackets (e.g., [Shaman]). It helps others find your post faster.
Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
Any hopes for 1.0 WE guys? Or been inferior to WH is a lifestyle in ROR too?
Ads
Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
WE is currently miles better than WH...quler wrote:Any hopes for 1.0 WE guys? Or been inferior to WH is a lifestyle in ROR too?
Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
Yep they are very good atm.Lileldys wrote:WE is currently miles better than WH...quler wrote:Any hopes for 1.0 WE guys? Or been inferior to WH is a lifestyle in ROR too?
Khorlar, Thorvold, Sjohgar, Anareth, Toldavf, Hartwin, Gotrin and others -_-


- TenTonHammer
- Posts: 3806
Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
in t3 yeah but T4 it even out and they are equals.
Ranged snare will never be reliable with people dodging it, dam rdps making people stack dodge n disrupt
Ranged snare will never be reliable with people dodging it, dam rdps making people stack dodge n disrupt

Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
I disagree with this the witch elf is better in groups by miles in T4 their debuffing power, ailment type attacks and greater sustained burst put them way ahead of the wh.TenTonHammer wrote:in t3 yeah but T4 it even out and they are equals.
Khorlar, Thorvold, Sjohgar, Anareth, Toldavf, Hartwin, Gotrin and others -_-


Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
Both can match-up really well with each other, but I'd give the edge to WE. As Toldavf said, ailments which cant be cleansed by the most popular order healer, along with kisses being better than bullets and nicer covers/dpsstacking skills give them the edge. WE also gets nicer access to 100% disrupt, as the WH tree for that is really lacklustre.
I think the main reason WH seemed stronger on live was because most WE went OYK spec 80% of the time, whereas WH always took PtF.
The only thing WH has going is their finishers from the trees being better. Exit Wounds in t4 can crit very hard with a nasty debuff ontop. Bal spec gets access to PtF and gets a small power increase.
I think the main reason WH seemed stronger on live was because most WE went OYK spec 80% of the time, whereas WH always took PtF.
The only thing WH has going is their finishers from the trees being better. Exit Wounds in t4 can crit very hard with a nasty debuff ontop. Bal spec gets access to PtF and gets a small power increase.
Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
While EW can crit very hard it generaly as a rule of thumb doesn't due to armour, challenge, guard. while 3k is possible with full sov anyone using exit wound should expect to see 800 allot more.
Khorlar, Thorvold, Sjohgar, Anareth, Toldavf, Hartwin, Gotrin and others -_-


Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
The differences in the classes are thus:Toldavf wrote:While EW can crit very hard it generaly as a rule of thumb doesn't due to armour, challenge, guard. while 3k is possible with full sov anyone using exit wound should expect to see 800 allot more.
Wracking pains- single best cover for your HD and WH has no equivalent
HRT vs Absolution- The finishers of choice when not using the speced ones, when compared I believe abso can come out slightly ahead due to guaranteed bullet damage.
Kisses vs Bullets- control vs rng is really all it comes down too
Tob or FM vs IF- is 50% aa haste worth 10% damage or at a max 15% crit, IF is my choice here
Witchbrew vs WH finishers- I like witchbrew here.
Death Reaper vs Witchfinders- Im surprised this isnt mentioned more but 50% crit for all group in all specs is kinda big. It can be a save button for heal crit, or a push button for extra dps for all group while wh is just 50% parry
Excom vs WE m4s- excom is probably one of the single strongest situation abilities in the game. If a WH gets to m4 in a 6v6 type of situation its almost a guaranteed kill while WE m4s are very bland.
Overall the classes are very close one way or the other to even. WE has a slight edge in groups and WH being the superior solo class in my opinion. The only real change I personally would like is to move seekers blade to inquistion and its tatic and move confess to confession to balance out wracking pains. Then add the ability for both classes to use kisses/bullets in stealth and their root break.
Tklees Chatoullier
Gagirbinn
Gagirbinn
Ads
Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
Till we have no melee pockets, no TBs, and no Df/Wf sets, every WH wold run 1-3 spec.
Having Repel+BAL sounds a bit better then 'kisses being better than bullets", while we are talking about soloroam.
Talking about group synergy, well for group synergy we have maradeurs.
Having Repel+BAL sounds a bit better then 'kisses being better than bullets", while we are talking about soloroam.
Talking about group synergy, well for group synergy we have maradeurs.
Nicelook | Obey
Re: [WITCH ELF] amelioration
Im confused. I said WH was in my opinion the better solo class of the two and that is because of the RB spec, although RB is overrated due to the fact it can be servered (an undefendale attack). And yes mara is better than WE at group synergy, and slayer is better than WH, and at the moment WL is better in most groups so i fail to see your point when simply comparing WH vs WE. If its something lost in translation please let me know.Atropik wrote:Till we have no melee pockets, no TBs, and no Df/Wf sets, every WH wold run 1-3 spec.
Having Repel+BAL sounds a bit better then 'kisses being better than bullets", while we are talking about soloroam.
Talking about group synergy, well for group synergy we have maradeurs.
Tklees Chatoullier
Gagirbinn
Gagirbinn
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest