No, my point is thhat WE/WH having 3 secs gives them a niche and that they need one because imo, they have lower sustained comparedd to other melee.Tklees wrote:except when the kd is 3 seconds and its on a tank. Which is what this thread is discussing. Your point was WH/WE need a 3 sec KD for sustained damage.
They dont need 3secs for sustained damage, they need 3 secs because burst is their niche.
Witchbrew is by definition, a burst skill, you do extra damage in bursts, as in, when you pop witchbrew your damage spikes, a burst. So no you dont need to post screens to prove my point thanks.Tklees wrote:I disagree with that point I stated why. I guess I can post screens of my WEs dps in the current witchbrew no kd spec if you would like? My point about the duels was to offer a solo perspective of why WH/WE also do not need a 3 second KD.
Well since you did not get it let me explain, that is a saying from Gary Lineker, it has been repeated ad naseaum and just like your "being predictable is as good as being dead" is something that people say when they dont have anything of substance to say, a buzzphrase if you will.Tklees wrote:As to Germany always winning soccer wasn't the past world cup the first in like 25 years? Not that I care because I'm an unculterd american and love my Football.
You mean i should see the guy who championed that spec as the "best burst damage in the game" to see how good at sustained it is? Alright mate.Gachimuchi wrote:Then you obviously are clueless as to what you are talking about. Go watch bretin's steam for a sc or 2 while he's playing his witch elf and it will put any doubts of the sustained damage output of WE(I'd be suprised if WH wasn't similar) to rest.