Recent Topics

Ads

Changelog 20/02

Forum rules
Before posting on this forum, be sure to read the Terms of Use
User avatar
Scrilian
Posts: 1570

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#111 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:55 pm

Yea and a small hint why wouldn't hurt ;)
Вальтер Рыжий RU => Gaziraga BW, Valefar WL, Lovejoy
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos ;)

Ads
Tiggo
Former Staff
Posts: 1948

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#112 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:57 pm

Scrilian wrote:Yea and a small hint why wouldn't hurt ;)

well this is easy,its easily exploited for buffing with buff bots etc. (though it could be changed to that when a buff is applied WITHIN a scenario buffs stay even if changing group).
- Martock - Tiggo - Antigonos - Mago - Hamilkar - Melquart
- Smooshie (Destro)

User avatar
Gobtar
Posts: 799

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#113 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:59 pm

I would like to comment on the bunny hoping exploit and something I have noticed with this patch.

The majority of classes that get away from the melee using a bunny hop, get away with one hop, this does stop classes from hoping to gain additional distance. I am starting to think a melee damage multiplier might be appropriate as well, if you are jumping in combat you tend to open yourself punishment...but that is just an idea and in no way a fleshed out solution.
Image

User avatar
Scrilian
Posts: 1570

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#114 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:00 pm

Calling that an exploit(buff-bots) sounds to me a bit far-fetched.
Вальтер Рыжий RU => Gaziraga BW, Valefar WL, Lovejoy
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos ;)

Tiggo
Former Staff
Posts: 1948

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#115 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:04 pm

Scrilian wrote:Calling that an exploit(buff-bots) sounds to me a bit far-fetched.

another aproach: letting buffing happen out of group makes those buffs superior to the only in group auras e.g.
- Martock - Tiggo - Antigonos - Mago - Hamilkar - Melquart
- Smooshie (Destro)

User avatar
Azarael
Posts: 5332

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#116 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:21 pm

This is not a change from live, as far as I know.

User avatar
Soulcheg
Posts: 936

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#117 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:30 pm

It is :o

If RP or AM buffs you at sc, after sc all buffs remains :o

Sometimes,random people could ask you to buff them, so you had to invite them for a buff, then they could leave party. So i don't know why this change either.
[RU]GreenFire. //Grimward/Albiona/Edwin/many others
Image

User avatar
Tesq
Posts: 5713

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#118 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:38 pm

alredy pointed out this some month ago but "some" ppl suggested was not this way which is false as

lol

let enter bw and make buff 2x slayer then let him out and have 2x slayer be able to do even more procs while procs on their ID procs.

It was this way until some point it got fixed in 1.4 or even before to not allow this such of bad behaviour.
Image

Ads
User avatar
Soulcheg
Posts: 936

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#119 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:59 pm

And why this behaviour is bad, Tesq?
[RU]GreenFire. //Grimward/Albiona/Edwin/many others
Image

User avatar
Tesq
Posts: 5713

Re: Changelog 20/02

Post#120 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:05 pm

Soulcheg wrote:And why this behaviour is bad, Tesq?
are joke right?

make bw enter buff 2x slayer exit and then let em spam mean bw does not have a reson to be in party, it's just not only make whats better even better! is even a reason to use worst class good stuff with out have worst class inside party.

1 slayer can't buff bw partys but bw can so just use 2x slayer or anyother class that can exploit this flaw to have an 3rd part out of party advantage.(this is the very exemple of what happened on live 2x slayer with be procs + 2xwp proc spamming undefitable id aoe + shatter limbs.

it's calling exploiting at my house.
Last edited by Tesq on Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests