Maybe, maybe not. It's a separate issue, for a separate thread.zabis wrote:This seems to be another buff to 2h WP, will DW dok be getting any love?
A better question for that thread might be, "Given the changes to sets and 2H performance, is it necessary to keep the recent change to WP detaunts, extend it to DoKs, or roll it back altogether?" But if you asked that now, the answer would invariably be, "We need to collect more data on the new state of affairs before we can safely come to any conclusions."
Changes work best when you work from general to specific. In this case, we're starting with the general idea that the passive benefit granted by 2H for every class is weaker than other passives.
This isn't directed toward you, but toward the playerbase in general: Don't make the mistake of assuming that because we make a change or implement something new, that we stand by it 100%. We're always incorporating feedback, and we regularly change our minds on what was/is/might be a good idea based on that feedback or the data gathered. But we need that data; some conclusions can be forgone or assumed, but there are always side-effects you don't see and we need to know whether or not those will be good for the game or worse before we can make a definitive conclusion.
This is the reason why this is an "alpha" instead of a "beta." it's not just because the server is a buggy, incomplete mess, it's because we know what design direction didn't work, but we're still trying to figure out what will. Getting that right often means making and reverting lots of major changes like this, as necessary.
