About City Siege Quee System
Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2020 5:26 pm
Does anyone else think the City Siege system is unfair?
I know that those with closed WB will ignore it, but it is a fact that the system harms less active players, who play less time a day.
If you don't have a meta class, you can give up on winning if you're not very lucky. And whether you are RR 50 or 80, you will be left out of the WBs and will have to try to enter solo.
As much as the Live system was facilitated by being able to go out and try a better stance, it was still less unfair.
I think that to enter the queue it should be by solo quee.
So it would be less unfair, as everyone would depend on luck not to catch pre mades vs pugs
I know that those with closed WB will ignore it, but it is a fact that the system harms less active players, who play less time a day.
If you don't have a meta class, you can give up on winning if you're not very lucky. And whether you are RR 50 or 80, you will be left out of the WBs and will have to try to enter solo.
As much as the Live system was facilitated by being able to go out and try a better stance, it was still less unfair.
I think that to enter the queue it should be by solo quee.
So it would be less unfair, as everyone would depend on luck not to catch pre mades vs pugs