Re: Scenarios fate
Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2019 1:20 am
Input a Skill Usage Check. If you haven't used Guard in the last 2 SCs, then you lose your Tank Privileges for a week.
/sarcasm. But not really.
/sarcasm. But not really.
And Then melee sh are considered as a tank, it can be also well protected with appropriate equipmentGrock wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:52 pmdon't give them ideasTenTonHammer wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2019 8:06 pm 2) when guard taunt and challenge is blocked out when you equip a 2H
It's like talking to a wall at this point, that's why I don't bother giving any arguments anymore because they don't listen at all. Never thought I'd say it but I actually miss Torque because you could convince him even if it took ages to do it but Warg and Nath just know better, they are extremely passive-aggressive snarky and any feedback is just brushed off. It's the "am i out of touch? no its the children who are wrong" situation when the entire community is against the changes they're pushing but they're stubborn and bitter because we trashtalked them for so long they don't really care about anything we say anymore.DokB wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 12:11 am Are we really, actually, seriously, literally back to this “2h tanks are not tanks” bullshit argument? Did you miss the 50+ page thread back when the guard change was introduced or did you just conveniently ignore it and passed it off as “whining”?
Don’t tell me you actually used that ridiculously flawed in-game survey as a basis for anything?
bannedrmpl wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 7:44 amIt's like talking to a wall at this point, that's why I don't bother giving any arguments anymore because they don't listen at all. Never thought I'd say it but I actually miss Torque because you could convince him even if it took ages to do it but Warg and Nath just know better, they are extremely passive-aggressive snarky and any feedback is just brushed off. It's the "am i out of touch? no its the children who are wrong" situation when the entire community is against the changes they're pushing but they're stubborn and bitter because we trashtalked them for so long they don't really care about anything we say anymore.DokB wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 12:11 am Are we really, actually, seriously, literally back to this “2h tanks are not tanks” bullshit argument? Did you miss the 50+ page thread back when the guard change was introduced or did you just conveniently ignore it and passed it off as “whining”?
Don’t tell me you actually used that ridiculously flawed in-game survey as a basis for anything?
Makes sense!!!!Natherul wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2019 2:40 pmI dont make decisions on my own, but from me thats an absolute no. If you want to be a tank then use the proper weapons for it.Ironbeard wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2019 2:08 pm Natherul, would you at least consider counting 2h tanks as tanks and not dps? Because the majority ARE tanks. Maybe if they slot focused offense, count them as a dps, but otherwise they are tanks. Its inflating the pool of dps and deflating the pool of tanks, and the niche of 2h tanks IS scenarios, so it seems so very odd to penalize them.
A 2hand tank is still a tank because it still has the tank toolkit (just without HtL), while it will never be a dps cause no 2hand tank will reach the killing capacity of an mdps.Natherul wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2019 2:40 pmI dont make decisions on my own, but from me thats an absolute no. If you want to be a tank then use the proper weapons for it.Ironbeard wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2019 2:08 pm Natherul, would you at least consider counting 2h tanks as tanks and not dps? Because the majority ARE tanks. Maybe if they slot focused offense, count them as a dps, but otherwise they are tanks. Its inflating the pool of dps and deflating the pool of tanks, and the niche of 2h tanks IS scenarios, so it seems so very odd to penalize them.