I cant believe all the people who dont want to pvp in this game! Like its a bad thing!roadkillrobin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:05 am The objectives should be there as a reason to fight over them. There's no war without objectives to win. First you need a agenda to fight, global domination, economic growth, defence and so on. To reach those goals there's objectives that you need to claim in form of terratories, resources and so on that you need the controll over and blocking those rewards are obstacles.
Fighting for the sake of fighting isn't logical.
The only time I RvR is when there is aao or a fight happening, usually keep defense. The only zone in t1 to RvR in is Nordland over fest BO. The other T1 zones are worse than Blackcrag, not because of the zones themself, but because of this escort resource avoid enemy no fight mechanic.
I guess the Devs must think we ALL hate pvp? If it wasnt for SCs I wouldnt be in this game.
Yes Objectives should HAVE to be fought over, resources should HAVE to be fought over. But it isnt being made around that philosophy its being made around avoiding the enemy to progress because pvp is an option.
It would be great if there was only 1/2 BOs and we had to fight over them for resource, or if the only way to get resource was from killing the enemy.
There is no reason to fight and thats how they want it I guess.
I didnt realize that PvP is an option. I thought this was based on PvP? To find out it is an option and more changes in the game will probably be about doing less pvp to advance is a shock. Its something everyone should know about, some people like me Love to PvP and play to PvP and they want to remove that as a focus? Thats kind of a big deal, maybe no one else like I was is aware of it?
Why is pvp being removed? Why is it an option? Why is it something we dont have to do?
This is funny. Maybe they should just remove ALL our abilities and we just run around the map holding BOs and running resources around. I mean its getting close to that now.
