generally speaking, as of now, yes, there are more destro players. and yes lock this juicy threadDruin wrote:I am lost.
1. Are there many more destro than there are order players?
2. Is the class balance much better on destro?
3. Are destro classes overall better than order classes?
4. Are destro players more skilled than order players?
5. Should this thread be locked?
How come order is so bad ?
-
- Banned
- Posts: 31
Re: How come order is so bad ?
Ads
Re: How come order is so bad ?
Yes - and no.Druin wrote:I am lost.
1. Are there many more destro than there are order players?
2. Is the class balance much better on destro?
3. Are destro classes overall better than order classes?
4. Are destro players more skilled than order players?
5. Should this thread be locked?
See spoiler in signature for reference.
On a serious note, leaving one salt mine open and active could prevent future salt mines from popping up.
- peterthepan3
- Posts: 6509
Re: How come order is so bad ?
Because Destro has less casuals, much more organisation, and better players in general.
/thread
/thread
- Collateral
- Posts: 1494
Re: How come order is so bad ?
Then if you're in a guild why all this crap about pugging and 'playing just for fun', insinuating destro doesn't do that somehow? I'm pretty sure both sides have equal amount of casual players, and that people actually play the game for fun, believe it or not It's a stupid thing you said is all I'm saying. In other threads you want people to post evidence, yet here you show no evidence that 'order has more casual players that just play for the hell of it'. Or is BT compared to TUP the evidence here?Fallenkezef wrote:I am in Diogenes.
You have gotten overly defensive, made wide-eyed assumptions and I find it fascinating from a pyschological petspective.
Anyway to conclude; order is bad, they are only casuals, destro is op with op morales and op players.
Last edited by Collateral on Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- CountTalabecland
- Posts: 989
Re: How come order is so bad ?
I think the OP was talking about only pug scens, which are pretty random but overall, in my experience, bad comps for Order is the factor that causes so many losses. Just no need for that much rdps or dps in general. But they are just pug scens so why bother "balancing" them. To OP I say try to see if a good mix of classes is online doing scens, if not, try to find a grp or do something else and come back later. Especially if it is one of those 1/10 days, don't bash your head against the wall and ruin the game for yourself.
Only reason I roll them is because the best block rating shield is behind that 1130 emblem pay wall. Which means its a pugger's life for me until pop rates for grps are faster, but that is more of a problem stemming from the lack of playtime I have than anything the devs should do.
Only reason I roll them is because the best block rating shield is behind that 1130 emblem pay wall. Which means its a pugger's life for me until pop rates for grps are faster, but that is more of a problem stemming from the lack of playtime I have than anything the devs should do.
Last edited by CountTalabecland on Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brynnoth Goldenbeard (40/80) (IB) -- Rundin Fireheart (40/50) (RP) -- Ungrinn (40/40) (Engi)-- Bramm Bloodaxe (40/83) (Slayer) and a few Empire characters here or there, maybe even an elf.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 31
Re: How come order is so bad ?
because he is by far the biggest apologist on these forumsCollateral wrote:Then if you're in a guild why all this crap about pugging and 'playing just for fun', insinuating destro doesn't do that somehow? I'm pretty sure both sides have equal amount of casual players, and that people actually play the game for fun, believe it or not It's a stupid thing you said is all I'm saying. In other threads you want people to post evidence, yet here you show no evidence that 'order has more casual players that just play for the hell of it'. Or is BT compared to TUP the evidence here?Fallenkezef wrote:I am in Diogenes.
You have gotten overly defensive, made wide-eyed assumptions and I find it fascinating from a pyschological petspective.
Re: How come order is so bad ?
Trust me, he isn't that much better in-game.oioigitface wrote:because he is by far the biggest apologist on these forumsCollateral wrote:Then if you're in a guild why all this crap about pugging and 'playing just for fun', insinuating destro doesn't do that somehow? I'm pretty sure both sides have equal amount of casual players, and that people actually play the game for fun, believe it or not It's a stupid thing you said is all I'm saying. In other threads you want people to post evidence, yet here you show no evidence that 'order has more casual players that just play for the hell of it'. Or is BT compared to TUP the evidence here?Fallenkezef wrote:I am in Diogenes.
You have gotten overly defensive, made wide-eyed assumptions and I find it fascinating from a pyschological petspective.
- Fallenkezef
- Posts: 1483
Re: How come order is so bad ?
I look at the bigger picture, there is nothing wrong with organised, mini-maxed WB's like TUP and nothing wrong with Bitterstone's "get every Dwarf we can and get stuck in"Collateral wrote:Then if you're in a guild why all this crap about pugging and 'playing just for fun', insinuating destro doesn't do that somehow? I'm pretty sure both sides have equal amount of casual players, and that people actually play the game for fun, believe it or not It's a stupid thing you said is all I'm saying. In other threads you want people to post evidence, yet here you show no evidence that 'order has more casual players that just play for the hell of it'. Or is BT compared to TUP the evidence here?Fallenkezef wrote:I am in Diogenes.
You have gotten overly defensive, made wide-eyed assumptions and I find it fascinating from a pyschological petspective.
Anyway to conclude; order is bad, they are only casuals, destro is op with op morales and op players.
you are the one that got offended by an inference that was not there
Alea iacta est
Ads
Re: How come order is so bad ?
Well in my experience most players that are new to server play in pug environments, as do most % of the server. The simplest answer to destro vs order in lower tiers pug enviroment is usually really simple. Destro seems to have melee trains more often. Plenty of tanks, Mdoks, Maras, and the few WEs and choppas. You very rarely see a sc with 3 or more of sorcs or SHs. On the other hand, order pugs will have 3 or more of SW or BW in many of their scs. For pugs who dont focus and bad at kiting this leads to the melee train owning the sc.
*Just my two cents
(also never saying order doesnt have melee train or destro always does, all things change but this seems to be my guilds experience)
*Just my two cents
(also never saying order doesnt have melee train or destro always does, all things change but this seems to be my guilds experience)
- Fallenkezef
- Posts: 1483
Re: How come order is so bad ?
Apologist? For what exactly?oioigitface wrote:because he is by far the biggest apologist on these forumsCollateral wrote:Then if you're in a guild why all this crap about pugging and 'playing just for fun', insinuating destro doesn't do that somehow? I'm pretty sure both sides have equal amount of casual players, and that people actually play the game for fun, believe it or not It's a stupid thing you said is all I'm saying. In other threads you want people to post evidence, yet here you show no evidence that 'order has more casual players that just play for the hell of it'. Or is BT compared to TUP the evidence here?Fallenkezef wrote:I am in Diogenes.
You have gotten overly defensive, made wide-eyed assumptions and I find it fascinating from a pyschological petspective.
Alea iacta est
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 118 guests